"아이들이 집을 설계해요."

Translation: The children design a house.

[Kathinskowitz]

Shouldnt "The children design a house" also be accepted?

[obesehomeb]

Yes, definitely. They used "design" as a translation in other sentences with "설계해요". Also, "The children plan a house" just sounds weird to me in English. I feel like the word "plan" is used more aptly with events, and "design" is used better for inanimate things.

[SabianF]

It should be the only thing accepted. The current answer makes no sense.

[LelLWH]

I answered like that and it was accepted

[AngeliqueT17]

I feel like it should

[YW7k14]

Wait that is my answer i think it is accepted now

[mdrose_01]

Who thought it was a good idea to let children design houses?

[neuspmi85]

Lego

[YW7k14]

Periodt

[RoneBusky]

"to plan" is inaccurate. It should be design.

[Jeong-JinL]

Clicking on design, which is the word offered in the verb's pop-up gets marked wrong. This question is killing me, Smalls.

[soobee620]

Can someone explain why 아이들은 is wrong?

[BTS.blackpink.]

No it is right

[mofalt]

I was thinking of some artsy project with children designing the house two people are standing in front of. Then it would not require the definite article with "children" -- or would it by the Korean reading?

[jaak869302]

I think "The children are designing a house" is also right. There are no differences between "아이들이 집을 설계해요" and "아이들이 집을 설계하고 있어요(or 설계하는 중이에요"

[chilamleung]

아이들이 집을 設計해요.

[JasonW98]

Koreans also use the hangeul-ed "design". Anyone know that?

[imma_potato123]

Yes! But they mostly use for clothes or fancy items.디자인(di ja in) 이 드레스는 디자이너입니다(this dress is designer) like this