"숲에 늑대가 없어요."

Translation: There are no wolves in the forest.

[Druckles]

Famous last words.

[Nine-lives-Chole]

My fav song

[DavidDelaC873754]

"The forest does not have wolves"
Can this answer be accepted?

[breakfastKid]

"The wolf is not in the forest" is not accepted. Should it be?

[SvedishPlumber]

Is not in would be 안 있다 or 있지 않다. Very similar meaning, but not the same

[EricThomse1]

I don't think you can negate 있다 that way. You'd use 없다. 늑대가 숲에 없어요.

[Etyta]

I learned that if the particle is 이/가 the the sentence is "there is/isn't..." And if the particle is 은/는 then the sentence is " is/ is not in the "

[roserayne]

Anyone else think of 'There is no war in Ba Sing Se'?

[darkangwl]

it's always great to see avatar references

[Anti-social85]

I don't know why but I translated this as "there are no wolfs in the soup" -_-

[Sam-saminette]

No, because they live in the mountains^^

[Monzay]

And our SHR hero killed them all

[Iveseenyoubefore]

is the "soop" in "in the soop" 숲?

[taytannies]

yes lol it means in the forest

[Park755062]

늑대 - wolf
늑대들 - wolves

[JeffersonB538722]

I think Wolfs should be a typo, the meaning was known.

[EricThomse1]

You're probably right, since the rules for making plurals of English nouns ending in F are not straightforward. (Either just add S or drop the F and add VES [and some words such as "dwarf" can go both ways]. Unfortunately, you have to memorize which words go which way.)

"Wolfs" is a real word, by the way. It is the third person present tense form of the verb "to wolf", meaning to devour (food) greedily. "Instead of taking her time to enjoy it, she wolfs [down] her breakfast every morning."

[Etyta]

Ta da... Just learned how to write the plural of wolf in english

[talynnn]

I almost typed "There's no wolf in the soup" lol

[azeminar]

there is just BTS in the soop kekek

[kazeofhope14]

Said granny, she was looking very hairy on todays visit.

[viaaaa13]

why isn't just "wolf" accepted? there's no plural of wolf

[chanbyeol]

well, i typed "there is no wolf in the woods", is it because grammar or because the word "woods" isnt valid.

[Moaonceneverland]

Is there any problem if use jungle instead of forest?

[Tamisalami]

When do i have to say 숲에 and when 숲에서?

[KimTaetou]

Is "There is no wolves in the forest" not used in english?????

[EricThomse1]

You have a subject-verb disagreement. Since "wolves" is plural, you must use "are" instead of "is". Either "is no wolf" or "are no wolves" would work.

[Ganvell]

I read the sentence as "There are no wolve soups" i'm really sorry