"우유를 마신 아이는 키가 커요."

Translation: The child who drank milk is tall.

[izabellyohana]

this section is frying my brain

[Pengsoo2010]

I'm Korean and it is hard to me too ><
I'm learning English to leave comments

[conniestar16]

You're not alone it's hard.

[YW7k14]

Same

[AlwaysT1red]

Big milk propaganda lol ;)

[tessabanessa]

Does anyone have a link to a good grammar breakdown of tenses for this section.

[Ava506452]

There under the section in desktop mode

[josueetcom]

^also available from a mobile browser

[sameoldscene]

Why is it "drank" instead of "drinks"?

[niskigwun]

마시는 is "who drinks" and 마신 is "who drank"

[peter.cecu]

I think the reflexive pronoun 'that' should be accepted as a translation in place of 'who'.

[Ash-Fred]

All translations with that in place of who are now accepted.

[hippietrail]

"That" is not a reflexive pronoun. The reflexive pronouns in English are "myself", "ourselves", etc. "That" is a relative pronoun in this type of sentence.

[imma_potato123]

Yes! I'm that child i drank gallons of milk in my childhood and now I'm 5'9",too tall for a girl.
People attack me!

[Aleef333]

도와주세요

[YW7k14]

The tall child drank milk is the same thooooooooo

[GiovanniSantucci]

No it isn't. If the listener already knows of some tall child, then you would tell the listener, "The tall child drank milk." If the listener already knows of a child who drank milk, you would tell them, "The child who drank milk is tall."

키가 큰 아이는 우유를 마셨여요 - The tall child drank milk.

[anonymous0311]

There is no past tense about this sentence. Fact checked with a native speaker. Try again, guys.
It is:
The child who drinks milk is tall.

[YunisR]

마신 makes it past. Present would be 마시는