"Mr. Garam, where is the book?"

Translation: 가람 님, 어디에 책이 있습니까?

[chaejjang]

Is it also correct to say 가람 남, 책이 어디에 있습니까?

[ling.ko]

You have a typo. 가람 '님'.

Yes. perfect. in fact, I'd prefer this one. It's the most common, unmarked and typical question.

[helloimreni]

Yep! "책이 어디에 있습니까?" is correct.^^

[NooGuild]

What is wrong with "가람님, 책이 어디입니까?"?

[Alatriste_11]

It should be accepted.

[NooGuild]

Thank you. That's what I thought. I don't understand why it wasn't accepted.

[da_real_doyoung]

why is it 책이 and not 책은

[ladleow]

I think using 이 emphasizes the subject (book) while using 은 emphasizes the predicate, so using 이 would make more sense as the speaker is asking where the BOOK is.

[Puff_0507]

Yes Mr.Garam, where is the book?

[imma_potato123]

He ate the damn book lol

[PeterReill7]

I wrote 가람 님, 책이 어디에 있습니까? But it said it was wrong. Why?

[sikhundan]

This is actually the preferred correct version. The translation in the original exercise is pretty weird.

[angela69534]

can i also say it like "가람 님, 책이 어디 있어요"?

[FA_Silence]

가람님, 책이 어디에입니까?

[PeterReill7]

Copula doesn't work here. 이다 is to be and cant be connect to the lucrative particle. What you want here is 있다 (to have/be located) as it fits and is not aglutanative.

[Mabeck5]

Why is "가람 님, 책이 어디에요?" marked wrong?

[Alatriste_11]

I think it should be 가람 님, 책이 어디예요 (ㅖinstead of ㅔ).

[Elin608597]

I wrote 가람님 그 책이 어디예요 but it marked wrong... Why?

[Namikoo14]

How is "가람씨, 챗을 어디예요?" wrong?

[Namikoo14]

책을*