"Honey, what are you doing?"

Translation: 여보, 뭐 해?

[LewisH65]

Just for clarification, 여보 is more common among older couples, whereas younger couples (say <30 roughly) prefer 자기.

[fliegenpilze]

It doesn't necessarily have to be an older couple, but mostly it's used in married couples. Translation says: "A word used by a husband or wife to address each other."

[madison.b11602]

Does 여보 have a specific gender associated with it or does it go either way? And 자기 too?

[AllenWCamp]

They both go either way, or at least they did ladt time I was in Korea (30+ years ago).

[RQZ.Sash]

Why not 뭘 해? It seems there is no particle to the object.

[soobee620]

This is my question a year later (December 2020). Still not accepted.

[ElielF4]

I believe it's "뭐 해" because the phrase is informal, so you don't need to use some particles, the context is the determinant

[soobee620]

Thank you for answering. But is it wrong?

[Alma_Tadema]

Why not 여보, 뭐 하고 있어요?

[soobee620]

Is "여보, 무엇을 하고 있어요?" wrong because it's too formal with 여보?