its not that it has akward phrasing, its that this is an akward question trying to get you to look closely at the sentence structure.
고양이가 싱거운 음식을 먹어요? does the cat eat bland food?
고양이가 먹는 음식은 싱거워요? Is the food that the cat eats bland?
고양이의 음식은 싱거워요? is the cats food bland?
Why can't i write "is the cat eating bland food?", im confused as to how j got this answer wrong...
음식 has the real topic particle so it should be the subject in English. 고양이가 먹는 is a descriptive phrase, which is hard to learn at first because you have to differentiate between which is the real topic of the sentence.
The text to speech in this one is absolutely hilarious :') mognunumsigumsiwololo