"아무도 뛰지 않습니다."

Translation: No one runs.

[E.J.H]

"Nobody runs" should be accepted.

[Ash-Fred]

"Nobody runs." is now accepted.

[CalebJones16]

Yes.

[Chel_1215]

아무도 is such a weird concept though. 아무 Means "any" but when 도 is added it becames "anyone/no one" but ive been already told that putting 도 on every word turns it to the meaning of "too"

[LastSeong]

don't know if this helps but you can't use 아무 by itself. and this 도 is a different 도 then the one that means too

[BobPancakes]

The direct translation would be "Anybody does not run". In English we would apply the negative to the pronoun rather than the verb, "Nobody runs", which is why it seems strange.

[LastSeong]

아무도 = nobody
아무나 = anybody

[BobPancakes]

So technically it's a double negative? That kind of hurts my brain a little.

[Woodsman72]

Don't give up... In Poland we use double negative constantly:
Nobody (eng) => "nikt" (pl),
-----(eng) => particle "nie" (pl)
runs (eng) => "biegnie" (pl)
Nobody runs > nikt nie biegnie

[SeanFogart4]

At least in the Japanese, it isn't really a double negative. It's just that it's used in the negative so much that everyone has come to assume 아무도 is negative even without the negation. You look at how the Korean is structured and it appears to be the same. Only someone older would know about this though, and there aren't many of them left . . .

[LYOYDr]

I understand Koreans do not use double negatives as English but rather to complement.

[jiraiya1601]

so this is saying nobody is not running?? doesnt that mean everyone is running? how does this double negative translate into the sentence "no one is running?" :(

[ImTiredRightNow]

This seems like a climax in a story where this assassin dude is gonna kill everyone but they live somehow

[SuperSizedSmiley]

Wha...?

[peter720000]

Is there a difference between answer and "no one is running?"

[Ash-Fred]

"No one is running." is now accepted.

[LastSeong]

yes running is present progressive verses run which is just present tense.

[mmvrk]

Is 아무도 only "no one" or is it also "nothing"??

[soobee620]

This is my question. Based on the Tips section, it seems that itʼs both, because there it says that 아무도 is "nothing".

[Dannielle70]

Same question here. I'm not sure why this assumes a person--it would be helpful if the notes would indicate this

[NathanClin]

"No one is running" should be accepted

[Ash-Fred]

"No one is running." is now accepted.

[ChoYoJa]

I agree, the definition says nobody.......

[jaisaige]

Why does 뛰지 mean run and jump?

[jaisaige]

뛰

[conniestar16]

why isnt "No one does not runs" been accepted?

[Cassandra983]

Because that isn't correct English grammar. "Does not" isn't needed because "no one" already tells you that the verb (run) is not being done by anyone.

[Monzay]

Isn't 뙤 for jump??

[George_Wang64]

뛰다 can mean either "to run" or "to jump"

[Kiklmor]

In Korean, how would you say "not everyone runs" instead of "no-one runs"?

[laura690624]

Red light!! Green light!!

[Park_Arine4]

Usain bolt still exists