"아무도 없습니다."

Translation: There is no one.

[EEdLoh]

Does this always imply people or could this be, "there isn't anything?"

[starkid1009]

"There isn't anything" would be "아무것도 없어요." The 것 in this sentence would refer to things rather than people.

[fir72405]

Why can't they accept "There's no one" ?

[Ash-Fred]

"There's no one." is now accepted.

[nleconte]

Flag it.

[iesappie]

can it also mean 'there is nothing?'

[n.aandeg]

"No one is here" is also an acceptable and frequently intended translation.

[prizefig]

are you supposed to use double negatives like this or would "there isn't anybody" be an acceptable translation?

[josueetcom]

That would be an acceptable translation

[Tim880827]

How about There isn't anyone?

[elainekim2]

there is no one should also be correct - in fact, it's MORE correct

[Transparentium]

This sentence does not make sense to me :-(

[ThomasWelc4]

Q: "Anybody home?" ("누구 집에?") " A: "There is no one." ( 아무도
없습니다.")