Its.. frustrating to get these wrong when you leave out the object. When the object can be inferred, you dont need to say it.
Please submit a full sentence since you cannot infer the object here.
That would be "Do not touch".
Do not touch "what"? Me.
Your sentence has a missing 저를
I wish i could save phrases.. I would definitely us this owo
Korean used to say 손대지마 in informal way
What my idols would say if I met them
Why is this not 만하지 마십시오? 지 마 is the negative right?
To touch is 만지다...
Also 지 마십시오 is the negative request form
Can i use jeoneun?
direct object requires ~ 를, not ~neun (~는).
내 몸을 손대지마~ Ailee, right?
저에게 is shown as an example under "me". but it is considered incorrect. it translates as "to me" using bing translator. shrug
in this sentence, this action verb touch requires a direct object particle on I: 를
만하지 마십시오. < 없는 word
In korean to touch is 만지다. It isn't a 하다 verb