"Do not touch me."

Translation: 저를 만지지 마십시오.

[RolandoGue458740]

Its.. frustrating to get these wrong when you leave out the object. When the object can be inferred, you dont need to say it.

[Ash-Fred]

Please submit a full sentence since you cannot infer the object here.

[Monero558499]

만지지 마십시오

[RajasDaithankar]

That would be "Do not touch".

Do not touch "what"? Me.

Your sentence has a missing 저를

[sleepy__suga]

I wish i could save phrases.. I would definitely us this owo

[ONGlineshop]

Korean used to say 손대지마 in informal way

[Silverita91]

What my idols would say if I met them

[Lizardosity]

Why is this not 만하지 마십시오? 지 마 is the negative right?

[nleconte]

To touch is 만지다...

[CooperReid4]

Also 지 마십시오 is the negative request form

[nao.ramen]

Can i use jeoneun?

[dpatkat]

direct object requires ~ 를, not ~neun (~는).

[Fatou534706]

내 몸을 손대지마~ Ailee, right?

[BkR2KEDu]

저에게 is shown as an example under "me". but it is considered incorrect. it translates as "to me" using bing translator. shrug

[dpatkat]

in this sentence, this action verb touch requires a direct object particle on I: 를

[Serena824462]

만하지 마십시오. < 없는 word

[CooperReid4]

In korean to touch is 만지다. It isn't a 하다 verb