yr hints say das is those but then I got it wrong.What's yr problem???
I'm not sure I understand you clearly, but there is a subtle difference here between the English and the German as to how we conjugate the verb.
In German, the verb sein (conjugated here as sind) does not take an object. It must be nominative case on both sides, and we can swap these sides around without changing the meaning. A side-effect of this is that the verb always conjugates according to the number of the noun, rather than to whatever comes first:
Das sind viele Bücher = Viele Bücher sind das
Das as a pronoun is ambiguously singular or plural, so if you use it with a plural form of the verb you could translate it as "these" or "those" in English rather than "this" or "that".
Possible translations that I would expect to be correct:
"That is a lot of books"
"That's a lot of books" (usually Duo doesn't like contractions, but this is the default translation on the page I'm looking at)
"This is a lot of books"
"Those are a lot of books"
"These are a lot of books"
You'll see that in English, we conjugate the verb according to the pronoun, and don't have the flexibility of reordering the sentence without it sounding really strange.
I don't really understand what you mean about Duo insisting on sind meaning "has". That doesn't seem to have anything to do with this sentence, and I don't see it in the hints either.
YES, that all sounds good to me, too. But whenever I gave any of those answers DUO marked it as incorrect, and substituted "That HAS a lot of books" as the "correct answer".. It is not even a natural English sentence, unless maybe we are talking about a library. When I tried to skip, it just repeated the question, so in the end I just gave up and wrote "That has a lot of books" , so I could move on.
It might be because the "master" sentence in the database uses "that's", and then the database interpolates the contraction (out of context) as "that has", which is obviously incorrect. You could help fix it by reporting the error - the sentence discussion pages are usually just read by other users, who can't do anything about it...
Thanks all, for your helpful comments. Nice to know i have not actually gone completely mad. It was in a practice, not a lesson, so i can''t go back to it. Perhaps it was randomly generated, because no-one else had commented on it. But I did report it, a couple of times, so hopefully it will be fixed.