"Does the child only eat breakfast?"

Translation: 아이가 아침만 먹습니까?

[Cognocto]

Tips and Notes say:

The particle 만 means only. The topic, subject, and object particles come after it.

So why does this not say 아침만을?

[josueetcom]

I believe the object particle can be dropped sometimes when the object is clear like in this case

[Le_choc]

Could you also say 아이가 아침밖에 안 먹습니까?

[kimmksk]

yes you can. And your sentence is better xD

[trixia_b]

That roughly translates to "does the child eat nothing but breakfast?" As far as I know, Duo prefers direct translations so that people would get used to the words and their direct meaning.

[KRlander]

The answer is "아이은 아침만 먹습니까". Shouldn't it be "아이는" ?

[TeoJr]

Yes, I think you are correct. Noticed that too.

[nleconte]

Yes. Flag it if you can ;)

[lljuanmarinll]

Why "아이가 아침만 먹어요?" is not correct?

[carnationpink]

i think they're both correct, but this sentence is formal-high respect while your sentence is informal-high respect. you can say your sentence to regular people while you can use the original sentence to people above you, such as your boss.

[dullcheeto]

I feel like I'm getting interrogated by the CPS.

[gayestgay]

Nah he also eats plates