"빙하는 오 년 전에 거대했습니다."

Translation: The glacier was huge five years ago.

[pQpQrOPY]

Why is "that was a big-assed humungous glacier five years ago" marked wrong?

[Staszek456]

This very question haunts me day and night

[ggh443065]

Haha. But it's spelt as "humongous"

[CF00l]

氷河는 五 年 前에 巨大했습니다.

[sbuckeye]

인간이 유발 한 지구 기후 변화. v_v

[imma_potato123]

That was a one big-assed ice glacier which was discovered and then savagely eaten by 가람 씨

[Staszek456]

Isn't it better to use native words when giving a timespan? I mean, wouldn't it be better (if even possible) to say "...다섯 해 전에..."? I'm curious.

[jackisback7]

Some words and counters always use Sino-Korean, years is one of them

[Blisterseer1]

Global warming :/

[kam195208]

would the sentence change if you used the number 5 and not the word???

[Dorien309216]

No, you can use the number 5.

[cathy.nemt]

When do you use the long form of huge rather than the short form of huge?

[Blisterseer1]

This is why everyone should make ecosia their default browser!! With every 50 searches, it plants a tree. I have 11223 searches so far, which is 224 trees!!