"어디에 기름이 있습니까?"

Translation: Where is the oil?

[NoNo730245]

You're not going to fool me this time, America.

[Sam.in.Korea]

That's not an answer. WHERE IS THE OIL?

[rishabh.ma3]

Was it just me, or did anyone else have a "George Bush wants to know your location" pop-up on their mobile/PC screen after answering this one?

[Lunar_Turtle]

America. The oil is in America.

[IceColdKelsicle]

Does 기름이 only mean cooking oil? Or can it also mean engine oil or other sorts of oil?

[nleconte]

Any type of oil, according to endic.naver.com. Good reference with many example sentences if ever you're in doubt.

[BlueStreetLight]

I followed the link and translated the page, as well as looking through a few other websites, and I didn't see anything suggesting 기름 could be non-edible oil... I am probably wrong, but can you site another source which backs this up so I can be sure please?

[mhin1]

Its right. Here's the official dictionary: https://krdict.korean.go.kr/eng/mainAction?nation=eng

[BlueStreetLight]

Thank you!

[BlueStreetLight]

America has entered the chat

[Juan738101]

Looks like this lesson needs some freedom.

[deactivated user]

O I L

[Ree581547]

on my face

[JanSmutsKimchi]

기름 = oil
그림 = picture

[laura690624]

So 어디에 means where?

[rishabh.ma3]

Technically, it is "어디" that means "where". However, it is often used with the location markers "에/에서" depending on the context. While it is possible to make sentences without location-marking particles, you can make your message very clear by using the right location marker.

[Samantha332600]

I put 기름이 어디에 있습니까 and it was marked correct. Which one makes more sense?

[jmj6199]

Can 기름이 어디에습니까 be accepted??

[rishabh.ma3]

If you mean "기름이 어디에 있습니까?", then yes, that would do as well. Like I mentioned in my comment above, you can also omit the location marker "에" here.

[BryanCarte]

Is this also acceptable?

" 기름이 어디에 있습니까 "

[BlueStreetLight]

Yes