"There are only sixty-one books at the library."

Translation: 도서관에 책 예순한 권만이 있습니다.

[mazukta26]

Why can't we put "library" right before the verb and not in the beginning?

[Brett565243]

Technically you can but it doesn't sound as natural when speaking.

[angeeeelfs]

What is 권만이?

[wintertriangles]

권 is the counter for books, 만 is only, 이 is the subject particle

[37Vc7]

thanks

[WildWildBasch]

Why is there a subject particle after 권만, should 만 simply replace other possible particles?

[aileeNfanboy]

"책 예순한 권만이 도서관에 있습니다" wasn't accepted

[KaiLanguage]

Why is "있어요" not accepted as the last word?

[Duo_Euphoria]

It is correct just a bit less formal

[Calyope3]

This might sound stupid, but in this case why is it not 책이/은 ? Is it because the 권만이 already states the subject?

[Soccermom98]

I've noticed that all the counters have the participles instead of the noun

[mhin1]

The subject particle goes either on the noun or its counter, which occurs last. Typical order is Noun+Number+Counter+Particle.

[BobaBunny5]

Why is 도서권에서 wrong? Since you are indicating that the books are just existing at the library, couldn't you use it like that?

[kboowannabe]

Why cant it be 예순한만?