17 Comments
No, because in "Where do you want lunch", lunch is a noun, a thing.
This sentence is using the verb almorzar, so it must be translated as Where do you want to have lunch, eat lunch, etc.
- 23
- 5
- 2
I believe the word "lunch" in your examples is still a noun. In "have lunch," the verb is "have." What are you going to have? Lunch, a noun. In "eat lunch," the verb is "eat." What are you going to eat? Lunch, a noun. If you want to make "lunch" a verb, you would need to say "Where do you want to lunch?"
- 15
- 218
No, because "almozar" is a verb.
However, "Where do you want to lunch" is something we might say in English.
- 18
- 4
- 3
- 2
"Where do you want to lunch?" should also be accepted, because "to lunch" can be used as a verb, just like "to breakfast" and "to sup". (E.g. "I lunched at the burger joint")
- 23
- 5
Wouldn't "donde quieres que comer almorzar?" Translate to where do you want to eat lunch???
You might get away with "Dónde quieres comer la almuerza" but that's not a natural way to say it in Spanish, and you're adding extra words (Where do you want to eat the lunch).
- 15
- 7
When I write where do you to eat lunch and it says incorrect and the correct answer is "Where do you want to eat lunch " I'm confused
- 15
- 218
" where do you to eat lunch" is not English.
You need a main verb to go with the "do you..."
"Where do you think...." "Where do you want..." "Where do you suppose..." "Where do you walk..." "Where do you swim..."
- 21
- 14
I tranlated this as "Where do you want to have lunch?" Admittedly that is NOT a direct translations of the words but I think captures the meaning better than "Where do you want to eat lunch?"
- 20
- 114
I also said have lunch because thats what the verb is said to translate to. If was eat lunch wouldn't comer be in the sentence?!
