"They did not go to school?"
Translation:¿Ellos no fueron a la escuela?
"¿No fueron a la escuela?" was marked incorrect. Why would I need to include the subject pronoun (ellos)?
Believe it or not, DL did not accept: "¿Ellas no fueron a la escuela? Go figure! Nowhere does it signify that "they" are masculine. Could not "they" all be females? Pretty lame, DL.
Your response is correct and should be accepted. I said the same and will report it
Answered "¿Ellos no fueron a escuela?" and was incorrect. Is it typically imperative to have a definite article in this case?
Glen, often Spanish uses definite articles (where English doesn't) with institutions (like escuela, cárcel, prisión, iglesia). I'm going to church. Voy a la iglesia. He's in jail. Está en la cárcel.
I guess the idea is the school is meant in a general sense? I also got dinged for word order, moving the subject to after the verb.
What about ¿Ellos no fueron al colegio? I typed this and it was marked wrong. In my IGCSE Spanish course, I am being taught to say 'colegio' when I want to say school. I fail to see why this is marked as an incorrect translation.
There's a subtle difference in word order. I'm not sure if Duo is being overly picky here or wanting us to match that word order. The nuance is in where one is placing emphasis. When you say "They did not go to school?" you are emphasizing "they." If you change it to "Didn't they go to school?" you are emphasizing the "not going" part. Again, it's a small difference and English speakers usually use intonation rather than word order to add or change emphasis. So, I'm not sure how significant it is here.
"Ellas no fueron a la escuela" is how I answered the question but it was supposed to be "ellos no fueron a la escuela." I understand that ellos is gender specific and neutral but if it isn't a mix of gender and only female, why would it be wrong?