"Elle n'a plus de livres."

Translation: She no longer has books.

[Caper]

Why does the "plus" not refer to books? The translation suggests it refers to time, ie "no longer has" rather than "has no more books".

[Sitesurf]

Both "no more" and "no longer" are translated by "ne... plus"

[RaphaeI]

she no longer has any books?

[Alice54_Maree3.]

I put this too.I don't understand why it is wrong

[neverfox]

I believe (I'm not 100% sure) it's because you are essentially adding a word that isn't there. You've "used up," so to speak, the "ne...plus" when you wrote "no longer." So to have the "any" in addition to that, you need to have a word for it, e.g. "Elle n'a plus aucuns livres."

[Sitesurf]

aucun livre has to be singular.

The only exception is when the noun only exists in plural, like "aucuns frais" (expenses/costs).

"she non longer has any books" = elle n'a plus aucun livre.

[neverfox]

Excellent. Thank you!