"Nous attendons nos chers petits-enfants."
Translation:We are waiting for our dear grandchildren.
In the hints, it would have been educational to know "cher" also means Dear. The hint only showed Expensive which confounded me.
They are not equivalent to most English speakers, however. It is fairly limited to portions of the American Southeast. Learners should at least be aware that "wait for" means that you are simply "waiting", whereas "wait on" will usually be understood as "serving someone".
The context should readily make clear which meaning of "wait on" is intended. There are very limited contexts in which "serving someone" is going to come up.
Beyond that, the OED documents non-regional usage of "wait on" as a synonym of "wait for" spanning the last few centuries.
It need not be suggested as a usage, but it should be accepted.
Doesn't waiting on and waiting for have different meaning though? Waiting on is more like they are late, and you cant leave without them... Waiting for is more like just waiting.
I thought about it, and I don't feel any difference between the two. I would use "waiting on" and "waiting for" interchangeably, both in situations where a wait was reasonable and expected and where I was "kept waiting" unreasonably or unexpectedly.
To me "kept waiting" is the typical phrasing used to express discontent with a wait: "I had an appointment at 9 AM, but they kept me waiting until 10." (I assume "faire attendre" captures a similar sentiment.)
There are times its not completely interchangeable but much of the time it is.
How are we supposed to automatically know that the statement relates to grandchildren, rather than our own children?