9 Comments
- 10
- 9
- 7
- 4
- 3
Wouldn't "The Unsullied are powerful knights" be the original/most likely version, considering word order? Azantyssy is also plural and both are nominative, so I don't see any reason for a change... Can anyone clarify?
- 10
- 9
- 7
- 4
- 3
Gender is not it either AFAIK, since "azantys" is solar and the adjective ending for nominative solar/lunar seems to always be the same... I guess both should be accepted?
- 10
- 9
- 7
- 4
- 3
It actually IS gender, azantys is solar and dovaogēdis lunar, so the ending is different for both and -i is solar so it only worked for dovaogedi and if it were "powerful knights" it would be "kostobys azantyssy" (-ys ending) instead. Thank the Old Gods the endings are similar so we can usually quickly identify what word the adjective is attached to, even when case declension won't help!
- 10
- 9
- 7
- 4
- 3
Oh and just up clarify: the ending is the same between solar/lunar only for type II and III adjectives, not type I (so at least some memorization is in order, at least to form our own sentences, ofc), which "kostōba" belongs to.
In high valyrian, as far as i have observed, the verb at the end of the sentence is subjected to the first subject of statement and adjective is written just before the noun... Add up(fyi i also got confused initially)
- 24
- 21
- 21
- 20
- 7
- 356
Why "Mighty Unsullied are powerful knights."? Mighty+powerful = kostóbi.
That was a genuine copy and paste error. It's since been corrected. Sorry it took so long!
