"Ellos tocan la guitarra en el concierto."
Translation:They are playing the guitar at the concert.
116 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
965
I disagree.
The English present progressive is a standard translation of the Spanish simple present (indicative); and it is better here.
Why? There is no context here. Both answers should be considered correct.
You dont have to invent scenarios! The basic Spanish present tense can be translated as they play, they are playing, or they do play (the last typically used to form a question or a negative, do they play?). It is correct the auxiliary verbs used in the English progressve tenses do not appear in the Spanish. Tbe nuances of meaning in English are lost. cf amigo/amiga or tu/usted the other way round.
138
I've noticed a few of the phrases in Spanish are lacking the use of auxiliary verbs. The Spanish translations don't seem to match the syntax in English.
965
!Good observation! This is because Spanish doesn't use helper verbs (auxiliary verbs) the same as English.
As a native English speaker I would always say "they are playing the guitar at the concert" . This is assuming we are referring to some specific people ( the "they"). I would not make guitars plural as that implies that they are each playing more than one guitar! I also agree that it would be "in" a concert, in preference to "at".
138
I realize that the 'at the concert' vs 'in the concert' favors 'in the concert' as the preferred English usage. However, I have considered that Spanish speakers may think of the 'at' vs 'in' with a thought pattern that is different from English, more analogous to 1) I am shopping '...at the store' or '...in the store'. 2) I am '...at the school' or '...in the school'. 3) They are playing '...at the park' or '...in the park'. Perhaps Spanish speakers understanding is more like 'They are the entertainment AT the concert.' --which is probably better English than-- 'They are the entertainment IN the concert'. Any Spanish native speakers who can enlighten on this line of thought will be appreciated. I am just trying to make sense of the whole thing.
1325
I'm not exactly sure what you want here, because Spanish speakers aren't usually thinking about how prepositions are handled in English. English just likes to make things complicated.
The Spanish sentence uses en, and en just means that something is happening at that place. How exactly the object is positioned relative to the place is not important. For example, "Espero en la estación de tren" can translate as "I am waiting in/on/at/by the train station", but it all means the same: "I am somewhere at the train station". So to find me you have to go to that station, which is the whole purpose of the sentence.
If you want to be specific, you can use different prepositions, like "delante de" or "dentro de", but in most cases you don't need to be specific.
Regarding "Ellos tocan en el concierto", it just means "They were somewhere at the concert and they played". The most immediate conclusion is that they were part of the performance, so the English translation reads "in the concert". But if there's context saying otherwise, the translation might change.
138
Thanks for the thoughtful answer. I believe you are confirming my belief that "en" does not convey quite the same information in Spanish as "at and "in" convey in English. "En" conveys place but not action without context while "at" and "in" convey both action and place. Correct?
1325
Yes, something like that. It's about the relationship between the object and the place. En only says that the object is within the perimeter of the place, so to say. A purely spatial relationship.
What exactly "in" and "at" convey probably depends on the circumstances, but I'll take a stab. "In" is also purely spatial and says that the object is within the borders of the place. "At" additionally carries a meaning of interaction. If you're "at a specific place", you're not only there, but also make use of that place's purpose. For instance, if you're "in the store", you're in the store, but with "at the store" you're also shopping there.
But please note that this isn't a super general thing about English. I don't think there's much difference between "at the park" and "in the park". You can be "in the kitchen" but not "at the kitchen". And when you go to institutions, "in the school" and "in school" can mean very different things. Languages are very chaotic.
Agreed, and I'd add that prepositions in particular are too chaotic to try and strictly define their usage. Contexts can alter their meaning considerably:
"In the concert" would normally be taken as inclusion: Part of the concert. Whereas "at the concert" would be taken as location: Inside the concert area.
However:
"In the stadium" would be taken as location: Inside the stadium area. Whereas "at the stadium" could be taken as "just outside the stadium area."
The variations are many and sometimes very specific, which makes trying to pin firm usages on prepositions difficult at best.
I will say regarding "in" and "en" that two key usage nuances are "inside" versus "included in":
Estoy en el equipo - I am (included) in the team.
Estoy en el estadio - I am in(side) the stadium.
In this specific DL sentence the Spanish "en" could translate as either meaning, but in English we would use "in" for "included in" and "at" for "inside".
But, that's just this specific case, the next may be different, so it really is impossible to fix blanket usages on these prepositions.
780
I wish they would bring back the floating answers app i can see where I made my mistake.
1325
The Spanish sentence is talking about an event, "the concert", and a certain concert at that. So only "in the concert" or "at the concert" would be proper translations here.
The adverbial "in concert", referring to acting together harmoniously, would be expressed in Spanish with concertadamente ("concertedly") or "en común acuerdo" ("in mutual agreement").
1325
"Playing the guitar" (or any other instrument) is not talking about a single guitar. It's a more generalised phrase, saying that you know how to play a guitar in principle.
- Many children my age wanted to play the violin.
Oops didn't notice my own typo! Instead of in I typed en. I have arthritis in my fingers and they wander all over the keyboard, which is too small for me because I am also a little sight impaired. It would be fine if I could use the app horizontally but, on my tablet, vertical is the knly option. I get more things wrong because of the keyboard than Ibdo from a lack of knowledge! Very frustrating. I have complained but none of the updates have allowed me to rotate the screen (which wouls make the keyboard much larger).
1167
Why don't you attach a Bluetooth keyboard to you phone? It would make life much easier for you and they are very cheap. (Less than 20 Euros here in Holland)
The singular "they" is employed in English because we don't have a gender neutral singular personal subject pronoun. Using "he" can sound archaic, "she" political, and "he or she" cumbersome. The alternative impersonal "one" construction can sound elitist, hence the popularity of the singular "they".
Spanish has no such problem, because subject pronouns are generally not even employed: "He or she plays [they play] the guitar" is simply "Toca la guitarra". There is no need to define gender to the subject, and the verb remains singular.
Alternatively, to stress that no specific person is being referred to, the impersonal "se" could be used: "Se toca la guitarra" - "One plays the guitar".
If you're referring to instruments, then no, "jugando" is not used at all. "Jugar" is used for playing games, not instruments. "Play" is a verb with multiple uses in English, and non-English speakers must find it weird that we play both games and instruments.
Regarding playing / performing, "tocar" could be interpreted as either for instruments. Also "interpretar" could be used, or if you're referring to performing a piece of music "ejecutar". But in all cases there is no strict distinction between "play" and "perform".
1494
stuart, not exactly. Tocar is a verb that means "to touch" or "to play an instrument" or "to play music." See https://www.spanishdict.com/translate/tocar
Jugar [a] is a verb that means "to play a game," "to play a sport" or just "to play" (anything but a musical instrument). See https://www.spanishdict.com/translate/jugar
211
Unless this is a line for a comic strip, 'plural people playing one guitar' it should be: They are playing guitars in the concert.
'The' is used when it refers to something specific, the second mention of something or something all know about in nature etc.
1- I'm hungry. Let's go to the new restaurant downtown. {specific} 2- I just saw a girl run across the road. See, the girl over there. {second mention} 3- The sun is already up. Let's get out of bed!! The temperature is supposed to be great today. {common words}
965
As a former musician in a band/orchestra, I would say "I am playing the guitar" or "am playing guitar" (or even "I play....:)-- Both are OK.
However, in addition I would say "IN the concert", not "At the concert."
An audience person might sneak an instrument into the concert and play it, or they might play it outside AT the concert (as some kind of protest?); but band/orchestra members play "IN" concerts, not "AT" concerts.
If you walk up to the string section when they're having a snack together before the concert, and ask what they play, the viola folks would say, "oh, we play viola" and the violin section will say "We play violin."
We typically speak about the type of instrument we play -- not, say, my actual physical maple-backed fiddle or 80-year-old ukulele. My partner has three guitars sitting around his desk, but he plays guitar, not guitars.
1325
First off: have you forgotten about this wonderful cover by Walk off the Earth?
Second, the definite article is not only used when you're talking about one specific object. In rare cases it's also used for concepts - just like Spanish does it. "Can you feel the love?" does not refer to a specific love, "in the morning" mostly doesn't talk about a specific morning, but is more general. The same accounts for "playing the [instrument]": it doesn't say that you are currently playing this one specific instrument, but that you - more generally - know how to play that type of instrument.
1502
'In the concerto' should also be an acceptable translation. Vivaldi, for one, wrote a concerto for 2 guitars and orchestra, it seems.
What is meant by this sentence? It is unclear whether it is saying that they play the guitar as part of the performance OR that they took their guitar/guitars along to play at the place of the concert. If part of the peformance it would be "in" concert. If just on the premises somewhere it would be "at" the concert.
1325
The sentence most likely refers to the people playing guitar as part of the concert (but you can interpret it the other way as well). I wouldn't say "in concert", though, since the sentence is talking about one specific concert. Either "in the concert or "at the concert", I'd suggest.
And to answer the guitar/guitars question: In Spanish when you refer to the whole subject of guitars you say la guitarra. But in English you can do both and mean the whole subject of playing guitar/the guitar. See both ways mean my instument is the guitar. It works that way when you use it with play/playing? Hope that's clear.
1325
"Playing the guitar" (or any instrument) doesn't refer to a single specific guitar. Instead, it talks just about the ability to play that instrument.
1325
That should also be okay. But usually when you're saying that you're able to play a certain instrument, you express it as "playing the [instrument]". I can play the piano. They play the violin in their orchestra.
1325
I personally know like three people who play the guitar, so I don't think that claim is realistic. :)
996
People certainly can sing along at a concert, but i have never seen people in the audience bring a guitar and play along with the performers. At means to me to be in the area of the concert while in means to perform. But no matter, if Spanish prefers playing at a concert instead of playing in a concert of course i will use at instead of in.
1851
In English you can use either 'at' or 'in' when referring to the individuals performing the concert. In this context 'at the concert' means the same thing as 'in the concert'.
First off, it's "el concierto", so your question should be: Why not "al concierto" but "en el concierto" (with "al" being the necessary contraction of "a + el").
Generally, with regards to a location or event, the preposition "a" refers to direction or movement. You might say "Van al concierto" - "They are going to the concert".
The preposition "en" on the other hand, normally refers to inclusion in, or placement at, an event or location. So the difference, in general, is "en"=placement, "a"=movement.
It doesn't work, because the Spanish has a definite article that tells us it is a specific concert. It's "en el concierto", so it needs to be "in the concert".
Also, if you were talking about non-specific habitual action it would be more common to say "in concerts" in English, to avoid the meaning generally applied to "in concert", which is "together".
As a side note, there are many Spanish terms for this meaning of "in concert": de consuno; en conjunto; de común acuerdo; concertadamente etc.
133
They are playing guitar at the concert .....apparently is wrong. In english we normally dont use a difinitive article for an instrument. We can say i love playing piano meaning the same as i love playing THE piano. The pedantics of the translations is driving me crazy as im having to second guess what they want me to write versus what is gramatically acceptable in american engish (not english uk).