"That is not my grandma's jewelry!"

Translation: To nejsou šperky mé babičky!

[holzfaeller.marc]

What about: "To není šperk mojí babičky". Is it also correct?

[IonutDumit561410]

I second that: jewlery is an uncountable collective noun, just like @VladaFu pointed out in another message. As such, when translated in another language that has a countable noun, the quantity has to be deduced from the context. Since the context is lacking here, I believe both versions should be allowed (one jewel could still constitute the totality of "grandmother's jewelry").

[VladaFu]

No, not really. That would be one piece of Jewelry.

[mzOWNt]

why - That is …
plural - Those are …

[VladaFu]

Jewelry is an uncountable collective noun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_noun

[Sharon714742]

Hello: Just wondering if my response couldn't be considered correct:

Nejsou to šperky mé babičky!

[VladaFu]

Generally, "To nejsou..." is better when you spot something or they show you something and "Nejsou to ..." is better when referring to something that is already being discussed. Sometimes it is harder to decide but I would not add it now.

[Sharon714742]

Děkuji!

[Pollyhs]

Is me babičky the same as moje babicky? I wrote to nejsou šperky moje babicky but it wasn't accepted.

[VladaFu]

You need the genitive case (OF my ...), mojí babičky.

[Pollyhs]

to nejsou šperky mojé babičky Why is moje wrong here?
I thought moje and me were interchangeable

[BoneheadBass]

In this sentence, you need the genitive form, which is mojí.

[Pollyhs]

Thanks for your response but
the answer given was me babicky not moji. babicky

[VladaFu]

Both mé and mojí is correct feminine genitive. Moje is not.

[LetitiateT]

Genitive singulare (koho, čeho) - mojí / mé babičky

Nominativ plural (kdo, co) - moje / mé babičky.