"तुम जूलिया की बात सुनो।"

Translation: You listen to Julia.

[Radhe1o8]

The English sentence should be "Listen to Julia." The "you" sounds weird.

[aaditsingh8]

The तुम can be avoided in Hindi as well. However, when emphasising the order, the pronoun is mentioned. In addition to that, we felt that it would be easier for learners to relate the correct form of सुनना with तुम.

[Olexsa]

Maybe a comma after "you" makes sense in this sentence.
"You, listen to Julia."

[TheBestOfA1]

Agreed, otherwise it's not clear this is a command. Without the comma it sounds more like "you typically listen to Julia"

[soobee620]

To my (American English) ear, it doesn't sound weird as much as it sounds rude.

[kuyaC]

Is this imperative?

[Gita-ji]

Yes.

[H2PlaysYT]

What's the literal translation of this sentence?

[Aakhil6]

The literal translation is You Julia's talk (words/matter) listen

[PhilipNikolayev]

I am typing in the correct solution, but it won't accept it.

[Roni568]

Can't you say तुम जूलिया को सुना

[Roni568]

?

[LinguisticBoi]

If the infinitive is सुनना, shouldn't it be सुनतो?

[4Melissa4]

Why for "तुम जूलिया की बात सुनो।" we need the की and for
"ये लोग तुम्हारी बात सुन रहे हैं।" just बात is enough? Thank you

[derliesl]

तुम्हारी is तुम + की

[mangosohrbae]

can we say "listen to what julia says" ?

[visheshaga17]

It seems to me that there isn't a correct a valid translation in English which perfectly entails this Hindi sentence.
This Hindi sentence is highly dependent on the tone of voice. It can be ok to say this if the correct tone is used. But still this sentence isn't applicable in formal situation anyway since it contains तुम .

[ph.KqMXuE]

Hi