"वे तीन आदमी हैं।"
Translation:They are three men.
24 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
It can be used like that but without any context it will not be understood. For there, 'वहाँ' will replace 'वह' in this sentence.
Why does the word for women get pluralized (aurat, auraten), but the word for men does not?
Masculine nouns NOT ending in /ā/ do not change their forms in the plural. 1 kelā, 2 kele (1 banana, 2 bananas) - change 1 seb, 2 seb (1 apple, 2 apples) - no change
What is your nationality? I can see if, for example, you have a background in Pakistan you might have the intuition to expect "vo," but in this case, "ve" is indeed correct for Standard Hindi.
No that translation lacks the verb. The sentence वे तीन आदमी हैं। Those three men are., they are three men. Those three men would be वे तीन आदमी without हैं and that wouldn't be a sentence so would not have । (the danda, devanagari full stop/period)
How would we distinguish "Those are three men." from "Those three are men."?
I got the right answer and it even showed that I had the right answer but it said it was wrong
Correct sentence is वो तीन आदमि हैं which starts with "Vo" वो not with "Ve" वे. Either Vo वो is correct or Ye ये is correct, not Ve वे fits here.
