- Forum >
- Topic: Hindi >
- "Raj gives me mangoes."
"Raj gives me mangoes."
Translation:राज मुझे आम देता है।
16 Comments
आम is masculine and all masculine words that do not end with अ (a) take the same form in plural as singular. Thus आम can be both singular and plural, so in this case it actually is plural
आम is masculine and all masculine words that do not end with अ (a) take the same form in plural as singular. आम can therefore both mean mango (in singular) and mangoes (in plural). In this case it actually is plural
Why was मुझको not accepted in place of मुझे? They mean literally the same thing?
Why is it मुझे if there is no postposition/ the sentence is not oblique? Why isn’t it “राज मैं आम देता है”?
RanzoG has explained your question precisely, but to add to it you can just think of 'मुझे' as 'me' and 'मैं' as 'I'.
Like saying 'Raj gives I mangoes' would be wrong in English, the same applies to Hindi
254
Both of your answers are good, but I think they're best in combination:
Consider मुझ as 'me', and you have 'Raj me gives mangoes', which is closer than 'I' but still not right.
He needs to give them to me, मुझ को, and you have 'Raj to me gives mangoes', great (ignoring that natural English and natural Hindi differ in grammatical order).
And now it is in the oblique case, and finally मुझ को shortens to मुझे, without change in case or meaning.
Hindi is quite like that...the grammar is different. In French, we say une femme française, which on conversion to English becomes a woman French, but it actually means a French woman.
Why is देता है correct and not देता हैं ? Doesn't it match with "आम" which in this case is plural 'mangoes'? Or does it match with singular "मुझे" ?
