"He is not eating because he is sleeping."
Translation:वह नहीं खा रहा क्योंकि वह सो रहा है।
15 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
It should be वह नहीं खा रहा है क्योंकि वह सो रहा है। But there is only one है available.
I think the होना (in this example है) can optionally be omitted in negative sentences like that.
Can anyone confirm if that's correct or this is an error?
Up to now, I only remember seeing है omitted if the verb was in the simple present but not the present continuous
I am struggling with the placement of है in some of these sentences. Sometimes it is used twice, sometimes once, like this sentence. Is it because the entire sentence is about He? But other sentences are about one person and another?
no clear explanation yet regarding placement of hai in compound sentences. please help.
In this sentence I have to put "hey" at the end in oder to be marked correct, but in a prevoius sentence, I had to put it after the first part. Following the rule of the previous sentence, I wrote: "Voh nahi ka raha hey kyonki voh so raha." Is this sentence really wrong?
843
You can skip the hai in the part that has a negative, nahin...in this sentence nahin is in the first part so you skip it there but in previous sentence it was in second part.
- 1020
Regarding the comments above (missing है) can anyone confirm this answer is correct or not?
An image missing in Hindi keyboard hence i cannot proceed further pl.rectify
