"राज आमिर के साथ नहीं रहता है।"

Translation: Raj does not live with Aamir.

[AJ72T]

This is either because:

राज और आमिर दोस्त नहीं हैं।

or because

आमिर के बाल हरे हैं।

or possibly because...

राज का स्कूल अमेरिका में है।

I'm so loving the soap opera of these characters' lives...

[PaulMcEvoy5]

Could it be Raj and Aamir do not live together? That was marked incorrect.

[JerryCurry3]

Same question.

Edit 10-March-2020:

Answering our older question.

No, it would not mean that.

• with == के साथ. Usage: A B ke sath hai. A is with B.
• together == साथ में. Usage: A aur B sath mein hain. A and B are together.

"Raj and Aamir do not live together." would translate as "राज और आमिर साथ में नहीं रहते हैं"

[OJFord]

I thought so too, and have reported. Perhaps we're wrong, but you have enough upvotes that it's clearly a common confusion.

[Kay144809]

super confused about के साथ here. what does that mean? is that a phrase? is साथ an adverb?

[ziliya]

According to the hint, this phrase means "with" or "together"

[shyamala843700]

Spelling mistakes of names cannot be considered as mistake - typed 'Amir' instead of 'Aamir'

[Konnerado]

Classic comment AJ :-)

[jmegner]

Why is 'ke' present?

[ritahira2]

What is the purpose of ke in this? Amire is not showing ownership of something

[ziliya]

"ke+sath" means "with"

[ArnoNyhm2]

So, you could say:

noun + का / की / के is a genitive case

साथ + genitive = with noun

[Azeezah.]

Could we treat स‌‌ाथ as if it means surroundings? Then add में? Would that be grammatically correct as well? Essentially: राज आमिर के साथ में नहीं रहता है।

[Ute380545]

Why did I lose a heart by translating "Raj does not live together with Aamir"???

[OJFord]

In English you can say 'Raj does not live with Aamir', or 'Raj and Aamir do not live together', but putting 'together' in the first sounds weird.

[imma_potato123]

Raj doesn't live with Aamir cuz Aamir is GAY and so is RAJ •_-