"We stop again."

Translation: Lagi-lagi kami berhenti.

[Haakon388572]

Why is "Kami lagi-lagi berhenti" not accepted? In the other exercices, the adverb has been located between the subject and the verb. Is "lagi-lagi" an exception that always has to be placed in the beginning of the sentence?

[lili114354]

unfortunately i can't seem to report this one directly from the question...

for 'we stop again' we seem to be given two correct options:

'lagi-lagi kami berhenti', and
'lagi-lagi kita berhenti'

i selected the option with 'kita' and was marked wrong, but i don't see without any context that we can determine whether the 'we' should be 'kami' or 'kita'.

[Rick392366]

Yes, you're right.
They should both be acceptable, and already fixed by now.

[sapere__aude]

What is wrong with "Kami lagi berhenti"?

[Rick392366]

What is wrong with "Kami lagi berhenti"?

Kami lagi berhenti = We are currently stopping.
Kami berhenti lagi = We stop again.

'lagi' can have a different meaning depending on the position in the sentence.
'lagi' when put in front of the verb (as part of the predicate), has the same meaning as 'sedang' , indicating that the action is still going on (present continuous).

Kami lagi berhenti = Kami sedang berhenti.

[TgME10]

Can we use 'telah' here?
Like, "lagi-lagi kami telah berhenti", which means "we stopped again".
I heard "telah" used for expressing past sentence.
So i'm not sure does it work or not

[Billie631]

I think it works.

[BughasFan]

Guys it's fine, indos don't really care how u arrange the word, they'll understand lol