Both "Dies" and "Diese" + "sind Schlüssel" are acceptable. But we are only displaying one option. "Dies sind .." sounds more natural, even though it is less grammatical acceptable.
Multiple keys are referred to in this scenario (this is why the 3rd person plural of "to be" was used". "Dies[e/] sind Schlüssel." = These are keys. "Das ist ein Schlüssel." = That is a key.
Well, with quite a lot of thinking you can indeed find a situation where "Diese sind Schlüssel" might be acceptable. But DL should not teach such sentences, which very typically occur as translation mistakes (like "Dieses is seltsam, ist es nicht?") as a standard way of wording things.
Here is the situation I spoke of: Together with a fellow researcher you examine metal parts on a UFO crash site. You divert them into classes, and pointing to one class of metal things, you say "These are keys, aren't they? Your colleague is of different opinion. She points to another class, saying: Diese hier sind Schlüssel, nicht die, die du meinst.
Sorry, I cannot find any more normal situation, where any German in his right mind would say "Diese sind Schlüssel."
The normal way to say "These are keys" in German is "Das sind Schlüssel"
Was exactly my question. But my girlfriend said that germans would rather say "das sind Schlüssel" in everyday language
As I understand it, "dies" is the adverbial form, which doesn't inflect. The pronoun form, dieser/diese/dieses, declines (inflects) with gender, number and case.
Thanks. I will look for extra info. I had only seen dieser, diese and dieses before and this "dies" came out of nothing to me.
Can't "das" also mean "these"? I got it marked wrong. It seems like it can mean everything else. I have seen it used to mean the, those, this and that so far.
Yes. The normal way of saying this in German would be "Das sind Schlüssel"
"Dies sind Schlüssel" sounds very Anglo-Saxon indeed.
Thanks.:) I guess I should have reported the sentence then for not accepting "das". So far I have been using "das" instead of "dies" and its other forms unless "das" is going to be directly before a noun, in which case I use "dies" and its other forms instead.
Okay I know that 'diese is used when article is die, and dieses when article is das, and dieser when article is der' but I don't know about "dies" plz help
Much to my surprise, in the previous sentences, we got bowl = Schlüssel. So please explain to me why "These are bowls" isn't right.
die Schüssel = the bowl
der Schlüssel = the key
Dies sind Schlüssel = These are keys
Dies sind Schüsseln = These are bowls
Thanks! Since I never got to write these words in the previous sentences, I never saw the subtelty... Here is a lingot for you
I have a question about the meaning of Schlussel. When used with 'I', Duolingo says it can also mean break down or breaking down. Is that when talking about your car, or is talking about yourself, or is it either?
I don't understand where this "Dies" is coming from. I note down everything i learn and it's not in my notes. It's not on this page about demonstrative pronouns either on any of the 4 cases or genders; http://www.udoklinger.de/Deutsch/Grammatik/Pronomen.htm#Demonstrativpronomen
It's supposed to be Diese(+optionally some other letter(s) depending on gender and case)
Dies means this, that, those, these. Das means the, that, this, these, those. I don't know if a language can be that confusing. I am completely lost.
The use of Dies or Diese doesn't depend on the gender of the noun it is conected with?
As I understand it, dies does not change, but dieser/diese/dieses does change.
I'm lost with this "dies". From what I can search, it's the abbreviated "dieses". And demonstrative pronouns are supposed to be declined as adjectives. And when look for those, the only thing ending in "-es" whether weak or strong and in any case is neutrals. Yet here I have "Schlüssel", which is masculine.
Am I missing something completely? am I looking in the wrong place?
Shouldn't it be "Diese sind Schlüssel"? or "Dieser ist ein Schlüssel"?
Just curious, would it be acceptable to type Schlüssel as "Schlüßel?" I have heard that the ß and ss are interchangeable. Is this true?
It seems that Schlüssel is always written with ss not ß, but I don't really understand why. I thought that rule was that ss is written as ß after a long vowel, as long as there is no other consonant next to it in the word root. I hear the ü in Schlüssel as a long vowel, so I guess that either I'm wrong about that, or that there is more to the rule than I thought.
The vowel in "Schlüssel" is short (in IPA: [ˈʃlʏsəl]), so it can only be written with <ss> now. And also in the pre-reform spelling it was always "Schlüssel", never *Schlüßel.
Yes sometimes ß is used in place of ss but it is not always accepted... my german teacher told me this
As I say, my understanding is that rule is that ss is written as ß after a long vowel, as long as there is no other consonant next to it in the word root. Does your German teacher agree? If so, how does that apply to Schlüssel?
It doesn't apply, because the ss sound is part of the second syllable -ssel, not the first syllable Schlü-. It only applies when the ss sound is in the same syllable as the long vowel.
I hear and use 'das' in cases like this rather than 'dies'. I know that it's the un-inflected form though.
Why would Diesen be incorrect. Is this not the weak inflection of a plural ?