"Il loro cane non mangia caramelle."

Translation:Their dog does not eat candy.

April 5, 2013

This discussion is locked.


I made the same mistake as others, but this is no more a "trick question" than Italian is a "trick language." All languages have peculiarities, and without calling attention to them, how can you learn? Thank you mukkapazza and Skogby for explaining it for us!


Excellent attitude to have :)


caramella = candy caramelle = candies it cannot means "their dog does not eat candy." =/


Just like "hair" in "a head has hair" is an uncountable or mass noun, candy can refer to many candies.


Candy is plural and singular - candies is incorrect here. Even though you can technically count pieces of candy, it is considered a non-count noun. "Candies" is only used in specific contexts - similar to how "persons" is used in specific contexts, but "people" is usually the plural of "person."


Really, JOrlando3? A problem for the rule as you have just stated it: the rule lacks a criterion of determination for a specific context in which "candies" is "not wrong". Because you claimed that the plural form in the english translation is wrong here, how did you make that decision despite the Italian version being given in the plural? And how does it come to be that a noun that you admit refers to a countable multiplicity is a "non-count" noun? That sounds contradictory to logic and sense.


Especially not after the chocolate scare.


Just wait till they try hard candy.

[deactivated user]

    And the poisonous grapes.


    Candy can be a mass noun, so you can write either candies or candy for caramelle.


    But why is it "mangia" instead of "mangiano"; is it because the subject is "cane" and not "Il loro"? Gee I still get confused at times. :)


    "Loro" doesn't mean "they" here, but "their". This is a possessive pronoun.

    [deactivated user]

      Very good, I agree, hair = hairs, but we are being marked wrong to put an answer that is also correct.


      Would "Their dogs do not eat candy" be "i loro cani non mangiano caramelle"?


      Yes, but candy is "caramella".


      In this case however it is plural, so it would be caramelle.


      I think of carmel candy for 'caramella' if that helps anyone!


      I got is wrong cause I accidentally typed eats instead of eat seriously? But when I type tehy intead of they its still correct


      That's true. Haha, seems there's no room for typos in a language you're learning. They probably assume you don't know it.


      I'm sure it's because "eat" and "eats" are different words, while "tehy" is simply a typo. In the case of the former, DL marks the answer as wrong rather than assume the user just had a typo and have said user learn the vocabulary wrong.


      I swear the female voice says carne not cane, which of course makes no sense, but I still try to write what she says. Carne=meat cane=dog


      Carne would have a rolled R. I don't think it sounds like that.


      "The gods don't eat sweets." Thank you fingers...

      [deactivated user]

        Clever dog


        I wrote caramels instead of candy and now I feel stupid because clearly you dont use caramels as a general term in english :(


        If you give your dog candy and the candy has chocolate in it your dog will probably die. Reality check.


        Why not caramella?


        "Candy". American English. "Sweets". British English.

        Be good if Duolingo recognised both.


        they keyboard is Italian who can read that!!!!!!!!!


        Only if it's chocolate candy!!! :^)


        Is this referring to "their" plural? I'm trying to wrap my head around "loro" as third person m/f singular and plural.


        As i understand it, the singular / plural decision for the possessive word (loro, in this case) refers to the people count ("their" = more than one person), while the gender differentiation (on other sentences) refers to the gender of the noun/object, not the gender of the person in possession.

        I wanted gender to differentiate the person, as it does in English (his vs. her), but apparently (if i understand), in italian, you don't differentiate his from her. (Do i have that right?)

        In other words, if you ask whose dog that is, and the response "it is his dog" and "it is her dog" would be the same answer. Did i get that right?


        A dog that doesn't eat candy? Very unusual

        [deactivated user]

          Please explain better why it is not mangiano, since the subject cani was plural.......thanks


          I think it's because MANGIA refers to the dog ( singular), at least my lesson says cane, not cani. Loro is part of il loro, which is the possessive. It's my first day in this lesson and I am still learning so I appreciate feedback also.


          Should not be le caramelle. They have been so obnoxious at putting articles before every noun. Ny biggest issue the lack of consistency.


          I was to quick


          Why don't you say "il loro cane non mangia le caramelle". I thought you use the definite article to indicate a specific category of things in addition to a specific item. This is still confusing to me. Wouldn't you say correctly that their dog does not eat the specific form/category of food, candy le caramelle? Wouldn't the definite article be required here? I still don't understand when it is required or not and how you decide.

          Also is there a way to find your posts afterward? Sometimes I want to post a question and go back to see if it has been commented on and don't see a way to search by user for posts in the forums. This would be very helpful to go back to see your posts so that you can thank the persons who took their time to write back to you to help you learn. If someone has posted an answer to my question and I have not replied, please pardon me as I am new to this forum and don't know how to go back to the things I have posted consistently. I am finding if I follow each discussion my inbox is becoming too cluttered and often the posts are unrelated to the question I posed, sometimes I have not followed a given discussion in order to avoid having every new post to that discussion sent to my inbox as I can't keep up. I would like a quick way to search for posts by a given person instead. Is this possible?


          Just like chocolate, candy is also dangerous to dogs. Anything containing sugar is impossible for a dog to digest.

          Learn Italian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.