"Ci aspetterai in stazione?"

Translation: Will you wait for us at the station?

[Lily_blue]

i notice that sometimes it would say nel statione and other times it will say in statione, are they generally interchangeable?

[MaElMu]

it is "la stazione" so it would have to be "nella stazione" or "alla stazione" and I believe it is pretty much the same thing as saying "in stazione"

[Lily_blue]

oops, yes and thank you

[pjs7]

In the last ten years, in the U.S., I have not heard anyone use the word 'await' when referring to someone looking for an arrival of another, as in a train station or airport. On the other hand, attorneys seem to avail themselves of the word 'await', in most of their correspondence.

[bellichka]

"will you await us in the station?"

This is so far from actual spoken English that it's almost not funny.

[scratchy777]

1skloKo lo klL}

[DiazMarcelo]

I'm so confused, I know the translation would be 'will you wait for us at the station?' BUT why is 'will you wait for IT at the station?' wrong? I thought CI also meant 'it'

[fat.k1tty]

I don't think so, but let me stress that I am not entirely sure. I always thought 'ci' meant 'us' or 'there', and 'lo' meant 'it' or 'him'.

[FlibustierMstgrs]

why couldn`t this also mean will you wait for ME (singolare)?

[StacyInDC]

Why "us"? I don't see where that is stated or implied.

[FlibustierMstgrs]

meanwhile i thought, in singular this would be "mi aspetterai", so it has to be the plural form, no?

[Forzafiori]

Ci is us (or there, in some cases.) So "ci aspetterai" is "you will wait for us".

[scandalousdan]

You can be there by 4:30
'Cause I've made your reservation

[pjs7]

Agreed!

[KirstiNitz]

Why not "alla stazione"?

[AndrewReyn392057]

"Will you wait at the station for us" is not accepted. Why?

[lonna11]

i put "will you wait at the station for us" and it was marked wrong

[sonoluomo]

Wtf