13 Comments
- 23
- 22
- 20
- 19
- 13
- 10
- 9
- 8
- 7
Is "voller" here in accordance with "Spaß"? If there was "Lust" instead of "Spaß", would there be "volle" instead?
- 21
- 12
- 10
- 10
- 6
- 5
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 2
- 2
- 2
- 2
"voller" = full of/filled with. It would still be "voller" for "Lust" or "Freude". "voll" is ok too.
- 25
- 20
- 12
- 9
- 7
From what I read on another comment section "voller" isn't really an adjective and it doesn't decline, so it'd "voller" in all cases and genders.
Unlike some dictionary sites, which call it an adjective, I think Wiktionary has the goods on this bad boy:
"Adverb
voller (followed by a plural or uncountable noun)
full of"
- 25
- 23
- 18
- 16
- 14
- 14
- 12
- 11
- 7
- 5
Duden calls it a preposition (and you'd hope they'd know): http://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/voller . Both seem more reasonable than classing it as an adjective, though.
- 18
- 14
- 12
- 9
- 3
- 2
Pleasure is usually translated as die Lust / das Vergnügen / die Freude but not Spaß. Spaß is just fun (although it may be used colloquially for pleasure, but not the kind that is meant in the sentence above...) .
- 25
- 23
- 21
- 16
- 16
- 12
- 12
- 11
- 10
- 10
- 10
- 6
- 5
- 5
- 4
- 3
- 1735
I answered "six days full of fun" (the suggested answer), but as I typed it, I also thought about using "six fun-filled days." Grammatically I can see it's different, but I wonder if it's functionally similar (i.e. the sort of thing that might appear in a tourism brochure, as I can imagine "six fun-filled days" being used as).
