"A girl was born in Germany."

Translation:Puella in Germania nata est.

August 28, 2019



Isn't 'est' present tense? I would have translated this as 'a girl is born in Germany'

August 28, 2019


The verb in this sentence is nata est, not just est. It is from the deponent verb nascor, nasci, which can mean "to be born". The perfect tense of this verb would be natus/nata/natum est, depending on gender. In this case, since the puella is feminine, you would expect nata. As a result, you get nata est, was born. I know that this course doesn't at the moment teach you the perfect tense, so I'm just telling you this as a heads up.

August 28, 2019


"natus/nata" literally translated means "having been born," so together with it "nata est" becomes "is having been born," or "was born."

August 30, 2019


Why can't "Germany" be in the locative here? "Germaniae" perhaps?

September 6, 2019


Agree. Why are we dropping the locative case in this... er.. case?

September 6, 2019


As I understand it, the mostly disused Locative is used only for cities, not countries. We say "Romae", but "In Italia", "In Germania."

September 6, 2019


"Puella nata in Germania est" was rejected.

So just how far does this "word order doesn't matter in Latin" thing go?

September 16, 2019
Learn Latin in just 5 minutes a day. For free.