"Sacerdos et vates sacrificare possunt."

Translation: The priest and the bard can sacrifice.

[lunalui]

isn't vates plural? so it's either vatis or bards!

[jaiirapetjan]

I also thought that, and so I looked it up. "Vates" is the same in both the singular and plural. https://www.online-latin-dictionary.com/latin-dictionary-flexion.php?parola=vates

[lunalui]

Sorry, let me rephrase this.
Well, I see now that the singular is also correct. Nonetheless, I did check a dictionary before posting this:
https://www.online-latin-dictionary.com/latin-english-dictionary.php?lemma=VATIS100

[Ankhi333]

Giving them a +2 on the next to hit roll.

[Stupidbro1]

XD

[Stupidbro1]

Hold on. Isn't Sacredos the accusative plural? Thus making the correct translation "They are able to sacrifice the priests and bard(s)."???

[lunalui]

No, the word (sacerdos, sacerdotis) belongs to the third declension, not the second one.

[Stupidbro1]

Oh okay.

[TerraWindh]

Bard? Are we playing Dungeons and Dragons?

[Axle496379]

The way she pronounces "vates" is incomprehensible

[Josh113410]

Why is poet not ok?

[Steve83777]

Something definitely wrong with her pronunciation. "et vates" sounds like "edward". Flagged.