"Non puoi lasciare che io diventi triste."

Translation:You cannot let me become sad.

April 20, 2013

This discussion is locked.


Maybe it's just me but I don't usually use "lasciare" to mean "allow".


Not just you! At least there are two of us now! This seems most odd. I checked my dictionary definition of "lasciare" and there is no reference to "allow." The sentence seems highly idiomatic. I hope one of the experts comments on this.....?


A closer translation would be "let"; for instance "lasciami stare" (let me be) or "lascialo andare" (let him go). In this case it would be "you cannot let me become sad", but the intended meaning might indeed be not allowing me to become sad. The online dictionary wordreference.com does list allow together with let.


Ah! You are a knight in shining armour coming to our rescue! I hope duolingo pays you in gold nuggets for all you do. Much appreciated :) I shall take my new dictionary back to the shop!!


Oh noes, have I made an enemy of dictionarymakers now? xD I think it'll have something to that effect as well, to allow is not its main meaning after all :)


I think that, in this case, if you allow "allow" as a translation, the sentence becomes easier to decipher; the point of the "che" becomes more obvious ...


It can mean to leave or allow. Like lascia che io sia means let me be or leave me be.


Come si dice "passive-aggressive" in italiano?


Have a lingot.


Lascia ch'io piangaA mia cruda sorte…


Rinaldo by Handel. A beautiful pice of music, often sung at funerals in my country.


This is all sorts of wrong.


Tutte le persone diventano tristi ad un certo punto.


I'm having issues with word order on these. Why isn't it "Non mi puoi lascare che..."


Much as I appreciate f.formica's comments always, I still don't see this translation and this usage of "lasciare".


Let's put it like this: the Italian definition of "lasciare" (http://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/lasciare/) has a pretty long number of meanings; among those 6.a: "Seguito da un infinito (o da che e il cong.), è per lo più sinon. di permettere" (followed by infinitive, or "che" and subjunctive, it's mostly synonymous with allow). 6.b has a number of locutions where "let" is more appropriate, as in "l. andare qualcuno, non trattenerlo, concedergli di partire" (letting someone go, not stopping him, allowing him to leave).


Thanks as always for the clarification BUT I still wonder how helpful it is in language-learning to use a popular verb like "lasciare" that in popular usage means"to leave" in ways that are four and five and six definitions down the dictionary definitions. I'm trying to suggest that duolingo -- again a program I like immensely -- could think about changing "Non puoi lasciare che io diventi trieste" to something that captures the sense of the sentence in a simpler way. I'm thinking the English sentence may need adjustment since this sentence/translation is in the present subjective section, as I recall, and the subjunctive in English, to my mind, is a different beast.


I think lasciare meaning to let or allow is quite common so we should know it


Luckily we have the same use of "lasciare" in German ("lassen"). The basic meaning of the verb is: passiveness of the subject, i.e. in the case of this sentence here: You cannot stay passive while I become sad. "I let my children drink alcohol" (allow): My children drink alcohol and I stay passive. Italian "lasciare" = to leave a person: I go away and leave the other person behind (do not actively take her with me). And so on ... all can be explained in terms of the non-activity of the subject towards the object.


You nailed that brilliantly where it comes to the German translation - lassen/zulassen, passiveness is the lever to understand the meaning of lasciare in this context. But I still can't find the word for an equal translation of lasciare to English. The German lassen doesn't translate without changing the sentence by adding other words and allow, tolerate or permit have their own translations to Italian. So what would be the equivalent to zulassen in English?


My verb book has lasciare che as a separate section. to let/allow "lascia che pianga" let him cry and "abbiamo lasciato che Margherita stesse alla festa fimo a mezzanotte" we allowed Margherita to stay at the party until midnight.

And lasciarsi, to let oneself be, leave each other, say goodbye, split up


to leave, to let be: I can see the similarity in the definitions


I agree, I would say you cannot leave me to become sad.


That would not be very good English, but then, the practice sentence itself is somewhat flawed - certainly the translation. However, see armandotij3's comment (towards the top of the list of comments) - he's correct.


Why is "diventi" used here. I mean shouldn't it be "divento"?


This is the point of the exercise - using the subjunctive. "Diventi" is the subjunctive.


Much more than it just being the point of the exercise is the question why this is a subjunctive sentence, and as much as I can figure is that this sentence is subjunctive to express an order/command/want/desire.

No offence intended tho, just written for clarification to those that are unsure.


Who would ever say that in English?


Well, being a beginner, I probably have it all wrong, but the given translation is (Google translate) 'Non puoi lasciarmi diventare triste'. That being said, being bilingual French and English, I see this as 'You cannot leave that I become sad'. Either way, I don't seem to get close


Sorry, just wondering, but how are you bilingual French and not know the meaning of 'laisser'? Because it has exactly the same meanings as 'lasciare': e.g. "laisse-moi expliquer" (FR) = "lasciami spiegare" (IT) = "let me explain" (EN). English even uses "laissez faire" (let [them] do [it]) as the name of an economic policy.


See above posts. Lasciare can mean let in the sense of allow and I am told by a native speaker quite often used in this sense


Why not 'Non può lasciarmi diventare triste'?


That sounds a very English construction. Am not sure it works in Italian


I meant "non puoi lasciarmi diventare triste". Does this not work in Italian?


I may be wrong We may need a native speaker to comment


Why is "you cannot let that i become sad" wrong?


Because it's not English: "let" is never followed by "that" in English. Is has to be "let me" or "let you" or "let him" depending on context. Or even "let it be"!


assumersi la responsabilità per la tua tristezza.....


I spanish we have the verb "dejar" which means both to leave behinad and to allow. In this case it would translate as "No dejes que me ponga triste".


something must be missing here or else it is idiomatic??


Might work in Italian but really - what kind of a sentence is this. I bet no English speaker would EVER use it!

Learn Italian in just 5 minutes a day. For free.