Would it be OK to add the preposition up, to use the phrasal verb "wake up".
I'm not a native English speaker so I don't know if there's a difference between wake and wake up. That would be off topic and I should go to learn English elsewhere, except the difference between wake and wake up has a correlation in English. Is that why there's no "up" in the translation? Does "wake" alone has a broader meaning than "wake up". Si that wake is more correct? Because I was taught to use the "wake up" phrasal verb and not, just "wake" alone. I feel as if the "up" was missing, but as I've said English is not my mother tongue.
There's a small difference between wake and wake up, but you can use any of them here, and both are accepted.
Wake up is more vigourous and dramatic.
Wake up > Wake
And also, you would use "Wake up!!!" for a command, not "Wake!".
As a non English native I' understand "wake" and "wake up" as if Marcus stops sleeping, both by himself or interrupted by something or somebody else. And if it is the moment when you stop sleeping, but can you stay on the bed. After waking up, or does it means that you stan up out of bed?
Be as it may, how would you say in Latin that Marcus gets out of bed as opposed to just stop sleeping?
In Spanish we say "despertar(se) " and "levantar(se)". And "despertar a" Marcus if he doesn't despertarSE, alone by himself, with an alarm clock et cetera.
I've studied Chinese and it also has different words for stop sleeping and getting out of bed.
What about Latin?
As a Native English speaker with a PhD in English I can tell you that "wake" and wake up" mean essentially the same thing. "I wake" can mean the same as "I wake up" "I wake him" can mean the same as "I wake him up" "Wake X up" is more common than simply "wake X", and it is not wrong. Some people may tell you that it is incorrect to end a sentence with a preposition but they too, are wrong! The only difference would be the imperative. You would only ever tell someone to "wake up!" as an order, never simply "wake!"