Would "non volo" be still correct or if both are as correct is there a difference of intensity?
Sometimes they say that ne+volo is "nolo",
and sometimes that's rather non+volo.
I would think it's rather the latter.
But it's clear, it's a contracted form, mandatory? Or not mandatory?
Nolo (non-volo) I
Non vis singular you
Non vult he/she/it
Nolit (non velit) he/she/it
Nolim (non velim) I
Nolis (non velis) singular you
Nolumus (non volumus) we
Nolimus (non volimus) we
Non vultis plural you
Nolitis (non velitis) plural you
Nolunt (non volunt) they
Nolint (non velint) they
Imperative forms: noli (sing.)/nolite (plur.)