"Ille psittacus suaviter cantare potest."
Translation:That parrot can sing sweetly.
17 CommentsThis discussion is locked.
This is a humorous sentence, because in Classical Latin, when «ille» is placed either before or after a name, it can mean “the illustrious” or “the famous”, like «Alexander ille» or «ille Alexander». Cf. Cicero, Pro Archia, 24: «Quam multos scriptores rerum suarum magnus ille Alexander secum habuisse dicitur!». [It is said that the great Alexander had with him many writers of his deeds]. Of course in this sentence «ille» means "that", but I suppose the parrot has reached new heights with his status that we could now refer to him as «ille psittacus (ebrius)»!
79
iste could be used as a pejorative.
iste psittacus could be translated as "That no good parrot!" I think.
suaviter is usually translated as: sweetly, agreeably, pleasantly.
Softly would be better translated as molliter
After a few pints, he'll sing Come on Eileen.
Isn't there other vocabulary to learn?
- 785
Question about english sentence: since "that parrot" is third person singular, why there is no a "-s" suffix in this sentence?
- 79
The verb 'can' does not take an 's' in the third person singular. Modal verbs tend not to take the 's' in the third person. "That parrot can sing", "that parrot may sing", "that parrot must sing", etc.
Reported the audio. Reason; she says mille not ille (or seems to perhaps due to editing and recording reasons)
She often seems to chew the first word. Something to do with the way it’s recorded I think.
I wish the "hints" translated "suavis" correctly... When I used "softly" as in the hints, I was marked down...