1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Dutch
  4. >
  5. Grammar: The Possessive prono…


Grammar: The Possessive pronouns in Dutch

1. An overview of the pronouns, pronouns and adjectives of possession

When you don’t want to repeat the noun you possess, you can also use the possessive pronouns included below. Mind that depending on the gender and article used for the noun, you use ‘de’ or ‘het’ and that there is no such form for ‘jullie’:

Example sentences of the different possessive pronoun forms:

  1. It is mine – Het is van mij/Het is de mijne
  2. The car is yours – De auto is van jou/De auto is van jullie/De auto is de jouwe
  3. The pants are ours – De broek is van ons/De broek is de onze.

2. The Dutch [ 's ] form

Another way in which you can indicate possession in Dutch, like the ‘s form in English, is by adding –s to the end of proper names and members of the family. If there will be pronunciation issues, the [ s ] will receive a [ ‘ ] in front. If pronunciation is no issue, the –s is simply stuck to the end of the name/noun:

  1. John’s book – Jans boek
  2. Grandma’s car – oma’s auto

In Dutch, in more colloquial speech it is also possible to use the unstressed forms of the possessive adjectives instead of the –s form. The unstressed forms of the possessive adjectives are as follows:

  • mijn = m'n
  • jouw = je
  • zijn = z'n
  • haar = d'r
  • ons = ons
  • jullie = je
  • hun = hun


  1. John’s book – Jan zijn/z’n boek
  2. Grandma’s car – Oma haar/d’r auto

Return to Grammar Overview!

July 16, 2014



There's a catch though. 'Jullie = je' only seems to work when 'jullie' is the subject. "Waar hebben jullie je spullen gelaten?" vs. "Waar hebben jullie jullie spullen gelaten?". It would not be okay in other ways. Wrong: "Waar zijn je spullen? Ik heb ze jullie net gegeven?".

Also never ever write d'r in formal situations. To me it just looks way too colloquial. More so than if you would write the others, as they are more just shortered versions. With haar/d'r there is a total sound change (H vs. D).

Often when you say z'n or d'r in speach you still write zijn or haar when transcribing, because it looks neater.


Are jouw and jou pronounced the same?

Is it van hen or van hun? In the tips and notes it says van hen but here it says van hun.


JOUW and JOU are pronounced a little bit differently, but these words are used in different situations so there is no confusion. For example: Het is jouw fiets AND die fiets is van jou. And about your second question: Is it VAN HEN or VAN HUN. Officially it is VAN HEN, but locally, like in Amsterdam, people say: VAN HUN


Yes. My native Dutch friend has specifically said he uses "je" instead of "jou" most of the time to avoid confusion - though I would imagine context would also give enough clues for you to understand which word is meant.


'van hun' is wrong, it has to be 'van hen'


a lot of dutch people themselves say 'van hun' though. But grammatically it is incorrect


what about reflexive pronouns?


The Dutch possessive pronouns cannot refer to plurals, right? The object it refers to is always singular, unlike in English. Please correct me if that is wrong, but otherwise it might be worth adding to this page.


Well, to answer the question 3 years later... Yes, they can. Just use 'zijn' instead of 'is'.

  • Het is niet mijn boek, maar de jouwe.
  • Het zijn niet mijn boeken, maar de jouwe.


This mixes plurals with singulars too. "Het is niet haar probleem, maar het onze."
"Dit zijn niet jullie zaken, maar de mijne."


In the tree, when we start the lesson on possessives, we are given the form "van hen" for 3rd person plural in the tips & notes section. Should this be "van hun", as on this page?

Also, for the 3rd person singular neuter gender, we see "ervan" and "hiervan" in the same tips & notes section, but on this page, we see "van hem".

Lastly, in the same tips & notes section, we can read that "You use je to avoid saying jullie twice in a row. For example: I give you your books - Ik geef jullie jullie boeken - Ik geef jullie je boeken", but this information is not given here. We only see "jullie" as 2nd person possessive adjective.

Thanks for your attention. :-)

PS - Great course, btw... I'm having so much fun, and I'm driving my spouse crazy when I mumble in Dutch to myself. :)

  • 1160

Is it more common to use -s to indicate possession, or to use the pronouns?


To use the pronouns, unless there are "two possed things":

  • Mijn vaders auto - My father's car

But you can also say:

  • Mijn vader z'n auto / M'n vader z'n auto (Both 'M'n vader zijn auto' and 'Mijn vader zijn auto' are not common)
  • De auto van m'n/mijn vader

If the owner is a name, -s is not uncommon either:

  • Piets boek
  • Anna's huis

Also common:

  • Piet z'n boek
  • Het boek van Piet
  • Anna d'r huis
  • Het huis van Anna

[deactivated user]

    How would you say "yours (plural)" then?

    For example, **It's not our book, but yours" ?

    Would you just use van jullie instead?

    Het is niet onze boek, maar van jullie.


    Ik, mij, mijn en mijne. There are so many different Dutch pronouns! How well do you know your Dutch Personal and Possessive Pronouns?

    Test your knowledge of the different Dutch pronouns with the below language test! Have fun and good luck ;-)


    Learn Dutch in just 5 minutes a day. For free.