1. Forum
  2. >
  3. Topic: Dutch
  4. >
  5. "Even though it is not cold, …

"Even though it is not cold, she wears a coat."

Translation:Hoewel het niet koud is, draagt zij een jas.

July 19, 2014



Ah, Dutch/German word order... how wonderful.


And it was so easy up until now...


I agree. I feel my head is going to explode into a purple cloud...@:-{ ....


I am there with you all, i guess its just a matter of keep it up


Don't worry guys, I used to learn German as well and it is really just about rewiring your brain. You are used to a word order, but what my German teacher used to say, as soon you finally get used to the new one, you won't understand why it seemed so difficult before:)

[deactivated user]


    How "normal" :o), but then again I'm German ...getting confused by German word order sometimes (especially when i speak a lot of english).


    I really can't comprehend this word order. It confuses the hell out of me. :(


    I appreciate the link but it does tell me why "niet" is sometimes at the end and others time not.


    So in this one the "is" gets moved but the niet stays where the verb should have been if not stolen away due to the subbordinating clause. So without the claude "het is niet koud" but after the clause "het niet koud is"


    It's good to know that I'm not the only one having trouble with this word order!


    What I dont get is that why the word order is reversed in the both sub sentences? I always thought that Dutch only reverse the subclause word order , but the main clause word order stays untouched.


    thats exactly right--in this case, its just the first clause that happens to be the subordinate one. when words like "although" and "despite that" are at the beginning of a sentence, it often indicates that it is the first clause, not the second one, that is subordinate.


    Yes, but even though the first clause is the reversed one, the second one is also reversed. Why not "Hoewel het niet koud is, zij draagt een jas"? Why is the verb first here?


    When the SUBclause goes first, then inversion takes place in the main clause. For example:

    Als je Nederlands spreekt, kan je een baan vinden. Je kan een baan vinden, als je Nederlands spreekt


    In this case, the dependent clause is considered first position. In the main clause, the verb is always in second position, so the verb must be directly after the dependent clause. Hence "Hoewel het niet koud is, draagt zij een jas."


    Realising the subordinate clause takes up a "position" helps the main clause inversion make a lot of sense here.


    I've got the same problem, cannot remember that "If the subordinate clause is placed before the main clause, then the main clause is inverted (subject and the verb switch places) - that's the case in this sentence.


    Then why is the word order changed in the main clause?


    Because there are 2 rules at play here.

    1. Is that in a subordinate clause the verb goes to the end of the clause "Hoewel het niet koud is"

    2. Because the entire subordinate clause takes possition [1] in the sentace the V2 rule means the verb of the primary claude needs to come first to be in the [2] possition.


    Separator words like until or because. The first part of the sentence is in order and the second is inverted


    Be right in word order and fail on spelling of hoewel... Epic..


    It's definitely gonna take some time to get used to!


    :'( How does this work? :'(


    why do i always write down like this :"Hoewel het is niet koud, zij een jas draagt." :(


    Even though it not cold is, wearing she a coat. Sounds like Yoda


    Even Yoda sounds more sensible than this to be honest. Haha


    Now you're just messing with me. This is the most convoluted word order I can possibly imagine in any language.


    From what I've comprehended so far, is the following right?:

    1.) Sentence starts with Subject pronoun, verb proceeds 2.) Sentence starts with anything other than Subject pronoun or article ( The so called normal subject we've seen so far) , inversion happens 3.) Sentence has a conjunction in between the proceeding subordinate clause has verb pushed to the end 4.) Sentence begins with Conjunction- Rule 3 applies to the first half of the sentence, and Rule 2 to the second half (because the sentence has started with something other than 'the so called normal subject')


    If this is the simplest stuff Dutch has to offer in terms of casual speaking, then chalk me up as the biggest idiot on this planet because this word order just doesn't make sense to me.


    I dont understand why in this particular case, the verb 'draagt' doesnt move to the end of the sentence like in most of the other ones.


    You wrote this 10 months ago, how are things now? Is it still confusing!


    why does the 2nd clause start with draagt??


    The Dutch like Yoda speak


    Do both hoewel and alhoewel mean even though? Synonyms? :)


    Yes, they are synonymous for the most part. I believe alhoewel is just an older form of the same word. It is still preferred in some situations (mostly in set phrases), but usually the two are interchangeable.


    Why its not "Hoewel het koud niet is,draagt zij een jas" actually Im so confused, where to put NIET all time


    When I finally nailed the word order, I failed miserably with that, too. I never know where to put the word "niet"...


    Separator words like because or until. the first part is in normal order like you're used to the second part gets inverted with the verb at the end usually but not all the time. Honestly it's just a matter of memorizing scenarios even rules have times where they aren't even followed. kind of like how English has i before e except after c but also isn't applied to every scenario


    Good to know it's not just me being confused by this!


    Why do you say, "Ik heb het warm" but not "Het heb het koud"? Is it a difference between how you speak of warm and cold or a difference between the subjects, " I" and "it"?


    Warm and koud are handled the same way. Like you said: Ik heb het warm / ik heb het koud is with "I" as subject, the subject that is cold. If you want to say it's cold or warm you say "Het is koud" or "Het is warm".


    Three weeks later I understand the difference between the usages, but it took a while, and some other explanations, to understand when one would use "heb" and when one would use "is."


    For people struggling with word order!!! Go on youtube and search for "dutch subordinate clause" there are a bunch of really really helpful videos which explain the word order.


    Would it be correct if I said, "Hoewel het niet koud is, zij draagt een jas."?


    no, "hoewel" is one of those subordinating conjunction words that changes word order of the second sentence, just like "omdat" en "toen" en "als" and a ton more. it's better to remember the conjunctions that don't change word order, because there are fewer of them. "en", "maar", "want", "dus", "of". (and, but, because, thus)


    There was a sentence before this one 'Als je hem niet hebt, waar is de tas dan?' Here, the first part (with a conjunction that changes the word order) is changed, and the second part is normal word order. I dont understand why in this sentence both parts are changed? Can you help explain? Thanks


    This is one of those weird things of the dutch language.

    If you start the sentence with a subordinating conjunction (like "hoewel" in this case), the main clause word order morphs into the question word order ("draagt zij een jas (?)").

    other examples: "Omdat ik moe ben, ga ik slapen." (Because I'm tired, I'm going to sleep) "Toen ik klein was, was ik vaak boos." (When I was little, I used to be angry often)

    You see that the main clauses are ordered like a question. Was ik vaak boos? Ga ik slapen?

    Hope that helps, seeing your question is a year old you've probably moved on but maybe it helps others.


    It did help, thanks.


    This made remembering the word order SO much easier, bedankt!


    Ah ok, I was wondering if it had the same effect as als and omdat. Makes sense. Thanks bluejay!


    Those conjunctions that you mentioned at last are not subordinating but coordinating and so no inversion or the action of main verb being sent to the last takes place and the clauses remain as they are.


    "Ze draagt een jas hoewel het niet koud is."

    Anything wrong with that?




    Can someone explain the rules for the word order in Dutch? I am so confused...


    See this resource from above: http://www.dutchgrammar.com/en/?n=WordOrder.58

    For this specific sentence, Hoewel puts the first clause in subordinate order, meaning the conjugated verb goes to the end of the clause. The second clause begins with the verb as the verb must be in V2 position.


    This is not related, but when is jou used? I know je is just a general you, jij is a exaggerated you and jullie is plural, but what is jou? And what is jouw? Are they your?


    i always write down "hoewel het is niet koud, draagt zij een jas" why is it 'koud is'?


    Hoewel makes the first clause subordinate. You're just used to the subordinate clause being second. I think it is a lot easier to see what is going on if you reverse the sentence:

    Zij draagt een jas, hoewel het niet koud is.

    She wears a jacket, even though it is not cold.

    Notice draagt assumes second position, so zij and draagt swap places when you move the clauses around.


    For those of us who have no clue what a clause is or even a subordinate one, can you explain using simpler terms why "hoewel het is niet koud" is wrong?


    ZELFS is the same as HOEWEL !!!


    And I thought Greek was difficult!


    Why isn't there any explanation? How does it work?


    This lesson is kicking my booty !


    Now I know why my Dutch wife, of 45 years, is a little odd.


    Its getting harder now


    why does Hoewel het niet koud is zij draagt een jas not count???????????????????????????????????????


    I feel for you my friend


    The word placement seems awkward and backward when translated to English. That's why it is difficult and needs practice.


    Difference between jas and mantel?


    jas is common and just any kind of coat or jacket. mantel is an old fashioned way of saying that or referring to some kind of royal clothing or something knights would wear. stick with jas and you're good. :)


    Why is it 'draagt zij' and not 'draag zij'? I though in Dutch, you dropped the 't' at the end of on the verb (draagt) for the third person if it came before the subject.


    That only happens with the second person singular (so only with 'jij' or 'je'). ;)


    So hard this phrase buuf


    Why is it "draagt zij een jas" and "not zij een jas draagt"


    Why can't the second part be "ze een jas draagt"


    Yes, i know most of this thread is understandably on word order but i too would like to know if the stressed 'zij' is necessary here as Duo is insisting on it.


    Every time I write hoewel it says I am wrong and corrects me to ook al and then when it comes up again and I write ook al it says I'm wrong and corrects me to hoewel!!!! I can't get past this level I have to keep skipping the question. SO ANNOYING!


    "Ofschoon het niet koud is, draagt zij een jas", should be correct also


    Is there a reason we have moved niet here because if there is I have no clue why It took me about 5 attemps to get this sentance right and Im still no the wiser as to why


    why 'koud is' rather than 'koud hebt'?


    It's the difference between It's cold (het is koud) and I'm cold (ik heb het koud).


    However difficult it is or isn't...., je ne comprend pas


    Why is it "draagt zij een jas" instead of "zij draagt een jas"? I understand that subordinate sentences gets the verb at the end, but "she wears a coat" shouldn't be the main clause and therefore not be changed?


    If you start the sentence with a subordinating conjunction (like "hoewel" in this case), the main clause word order morphs into the question word order ("draagt zij een jas (?)").


    Why is "Hoevel het koud niet is,..." incorrect


    Hoevel != Hoewel. I can't tell if you misspelled "hoewel" or if you misspelled "hoeveel". "Hoeveel" is "how much" and "Hoewel" is "even though".

    The "niet" I think would also more naturally go in front of "koud" as you're directly negating that instead of the sentence as a whole, but I don't think that is an error per se.


    Word order is pants...


    Why is "hoewel het niet koud heeft , draagt zij een jas" incorrect?


    if ook al is wrong, why is given as an alternative answer woke pcd idiots


    Right, subordinate clause in front of the main clause. I didn't see it coming.

    Learn Dutch in just 5 minutes a day. For free.