I don't think proper names should be evaluated or translated. Sometimes you haven't heard a name and spelling it right the first time would be really difficult.
It is the norm for language courses to translate names, in order for the students to become aware of equivalent names across cultures, and so that they don't need to change phonologies in the middle of a sentence. You are free to translate or not translate the name: both will be accepted. So, I don't see the reason to complain.
Roose Bolton. Bolton's sigil is pink (= rosa in my language - rosa means both rose and pink). You did good Martin.
I think that the name "Roos" should not be translated. Same way as we don't translate Chinese or Arabic names. But we preserve pronunciation instead.
There really is no universal standard for this. My wife's name is Maria. She volunteers on summer camps for orphans in Ukraine, and there they call her Masha. On the other hand, my wife is Swedish, and in Sweden, Maria is the translation of the name of Jesus' mother, who we call Mary in English. So, should I call my wife Mary or Maria? Our 14-year-old sometimes calls her Masha. My brother-in-law is Paul, but he goes by Pasha in Ukraine. My name's Andrew, but no one in America pronounces it the way my mother did when I was growing up in England. So, in the real work, it's more a matter of preference than protocol, a purely arbitrary decision.
Well, I think it really is also a cultural thing -you simply have an option at all to translate names between most European languages, because often they have similar roots and similar naming traditions (biblical names for instance). And it doesn't hurt the names to get translated or not get translated, because their Status as names and their equivalents in different languages are known across Europe.
When I went to Chinese classes in real life, the the teachers would pronounce the Japanese student's Names with the Chinese readings of their name's characters and that was accepted.
Between cultures that share a history it seems to be very normal to have accepted equivalents for names.
To me, it seems much nicer than what the Chinese do to European names, because they don't translate them, they transcribe them, but with characters that don't actually mean what the words mean, which robs the characters of their meaning and the names of their original power because they sound ugly.
It's not a big deal for most every day words though. Objects don't need pretty names.
You can't find a proper equivalent for all names, especially if it comes from a culture that is set apart a bit. But even if you don't "translate" a word by meaning, it still doesn't mean you didn't change the name in any way. It's likely that you change the pronunciation, put it in a different writing System and it comes out jumbled in the new language anyway. And in the new language, the word doesn't feel right, because the syllables that sound pretty and suitable for a name in one language, sound strange and may have a stupid meaning in the other language.
That's why being able to translate a name can be a very good thing for people. It's no accident that many Giovannis, Johanns, Jans and Ivans became Johns when they came to the US -back then it would help the new immigrants become American by taking the name.
The more extreme is also, to simply take a completely new name (which Europeans in China may do, because Chinese transcriptions can sound really silly).
I think it does also show the tolerance of a culture if people don't need to change or translate their name when they come to a new place to be accepted there, on the other hand, taking a new name in a new place is a sign of a person to show their own immersion into the other culture.
In this case, I think it's very much okay, because both words, Roos and Rose have literally the same meaning and because it's not the name of a person who has already established being only one of the two name variants, but just a fictional example.
I think it does remain mostly a matter of taste and situation. But it's not just a simply "no, you shouldn't" or "yes, you should" because names, culture and language (which concern names) are complicated.
I could go on and on about this topic :P
Instead of "Mijn naam is ...", people more often introduce themselves using the verb "heten": "Ik heet Angel. En ❤❤❤ heet jij?"
- "Dat is mijn broek" (those are my pants).
- "De broek is van mij" (the pants are mine).