"Do you have pants?"
Translation:Hebben jullie broeken?
It's an English (US) - Dutch course, so we're using the US spelling and common words as preferred translation. We try to accept spelling and alternative translations of the other standard English forms (UK, IE, CA, AU, NZ, ZA) as well, but it's possible that alternatives are missing in the accepted answers, because they are not added yet or we don't know them (we only have US and UK native speakers in the team). That's why we're depending on users to use the report a problem button during lessons to report errors and missing alternative translations.
I had this question as a "select all that are correct". I had the option of "Hebben jullie broeken" and "hebben jullie broek" and some other one that was definitely wrong. I was under the impression that pants could imply both a pair of pants (broek) AND multiple pairs of pants (broeken). And so I selected both and got it wrong. Am I wrong in thinking this?
It's ambiguous when you need to translate from English to dutch. The example stated, you have no pants. It could mean two things. The person is wearing no pants at the moment, or has no pants at all in their possession. But in English, pants is both plural and singular. Like sheep. One sheep two sheep. One pants two pants. I posted an error request.
Perhaps you could say it your way too, but wouldn't you say do you have pants on?
Either way if you want to use that meaning it does need it in dutch.
Do you have pants (on)?
Heb je een broek aan? (Or hebben jullie)
Im pretty sure that's not the sentence you wrote.
I know it's too late for keallii but perhaps helpful to others.
Yes, but "heeft" is used for "u", "hij", "zij" and "het", but "je" and "jij" use "hebt" (which can also be used for "u" actually). So:
- Je/Jij hebt
- U hebt/heeft
- Hij/Zij/Het heeft
However, if the verb is placed in front of the pronoun, something happens to the verb with "jij" or "je":
- Heb jij/je
- Hebt/Heeft u
- Heeft hij/zij/het