The man strode up to the bar with an air of nonchalance, choosing his bar stool with deliberate casualness.
There was a woman to his right.
He turned ever so smoothly, signaling the bartender for two glasses of wine. He flashed the woman a smile, shifting in his seat.
"Waarom heb jij een eend?" He asked, offering her one of the glasses as the bartender placed them onto the mahogany counter.
There was indeed a duck in her lap.
She ignored him. "Ik wil een boterham zonder ei, alsjeblieft," she said to the bartender.
The man tried again. "Ik ben een banaan!"
He winked at her, and offered her duck part of his sandwich. "Uw eend houdt van brood, ja?"
She frowned. "Mijn eend wil geen jouw brood geen jouw banaan, dank je wel."
The bartender chose that moment to interrupt, having forgotten who wanted what sandwich. "Het spijt me, mevrouw, maar welke boterham is van jou? De boterham met kaas, of de boterham zonder ei?"
"De boterham zonder ei," she said tersely.
"Uw houdt van bananen, ja?" Tried the man once more.
The duck chose that moment to quack rather loudly. "Quack," to be precise.
The man blinked, somewhat taken aback. "De eend is niet Nederlands?"
"Nee," replied the woman. "Mijn eend is Engels."
The man then noticed that the duck was drinking tea from a saucer and that the woman was feeding it scones.
"Oke," said the man, realizing that they had gotten off on the wrong foot and that there was little chance of him salvaging the situation. He pushed his stool back and stood up. As he took out his wallet to pay for the drinks, he gave it one more shot. "Oke, oke, ik...uhhh....ik houd van de eends?"
The woman frowned, and there was a hint of danger in her voice. "Ik ben een appel!"
The man blushed and stuttered, "Oke, ja, ja, het spijt me, het spijt me, uhh, bendankt en dag."
The woman rolled her eyes as the man slinked off into the crowd.
And that was that.
I feel like I actually learned something after reading all this without using translate!
Straight from the Tips and Notes at the bottom of the Questions section:
"Dutch only applies inversion to form closed questions. Example:
1.Jullie zijn klaar - You are done
2.Zijn jullie klaar? - Are you done?
3.Jij zwemt - You swim
4.Zwem jij? - Do you swim?"
So, jij and je lose the ending 't' from their verb conjugation during inversion and only they do. This was specifically stated somewhere else, but I can't remember where I saw that. Probably in the grammar area:
Yes, you would split it in syllables as 'waar-om'; so the first syllabe is deemed 'closed'. Where as for 'kazen' it would be split in 'ka-zen'. Similarly 'waren' (past tense of zijn, [we] were), starts with the same sound as waarom, but because you would split in syllables as 'wa-ren' is spelled differently.
"Are you having a duck" isn't exactly proper English. There is a special context where English speakers will say something like "I'm having a drink," or "I'll have the fish" which is really just another way of saying "I am drinking a drink" or "I would like to eat the fish".
Beyond that context, you don't really use "having" in a concrete sense in English. English-speakers will instead say "Why do you have a duck," and Dutch seems to following along with that pattern. Therefore, "Why are you having a duck" would be incorrect grammar, and therefore wrong.