"Ajoute-le sur Facebook, ça lui fera plaisir."

Translation:Friend him on Facebook; that will please him.

June 24, 2020

This discussion is locked.


What strikes me is the "friend him" is very modern and slangy (not incorrect, just not something anyone would have said 10 years ago), while "that will please him" sounds old and stuffy like a 1960s British movie (again, not incorrect, but a very unlikely thing for a contemporary American to say spontaneously).

Reading the two parts combined is really jolting!


"that'll make him happy", would be a more likely phrase.

But I don't think that the French should be compromised to accommodate Facebook. (opinion). However, I might be partial to French, and have always refused to participate in Facebook.


For me the correct translation would be ''Add him as a friend on Facebook, that will please him''. But I guess the creators has their reasons...


"Add him on Facebook" works, and should be the default.


"Friend him on Facebook"? What sort of English is that?!! If I didn't have to choose from the given words, I would never have got that answer!!


Since 2005, the noun 'friend' has been used as a verb on Facebook. I explored Facebook for the first time a month or so ago, but I already heard the word 'friend' used in the Facebook sense many years ago. Of course, English is my native language. If someone is learning French through English without being very fluent in English, I suppose it's possible that in the past 15 years the person hasn't heard anyone using the words 'friend' and 'unfriend' either in the Facebook context explicitly or in social life in general.

What I don't get is why we can't translate 'ajoute' as 'add': add a new contact to my Facebook page. Why not?


yup I totally agree with you!


'Friend him on facebook, he will like that.' Not accepted. Reported. Maybe next time I'll translate 'ça lui fera plaisir' as 'that will give him pleasure' and see what happens.


I like "that will make him happy". It's both literal and idiomatic, somehow.


It worked, and it sounds weird.


befriend, add him as a friend etc, none of those works. "to friend" is the only option. This surely is Americanism.


No, it is because the French "Ajoute-le" actually means "Add him" and has nothing to do with friendship. For some reason Duo is translating "Ajoute-le" as "Friend him", a term which is used only on Facebook (and only in English?) to mean to add someone to your list, but other, similar terms like "befriend" are even further from the original French. "Friend him" should not be accepted nor given as the correct translation, but Duo seems to respond slowly to fix these sort of obvious errors.


I know "ajouter" only means "add" on its own but I'm just trying to be reasonable and answer in correct grammar. After all, when you perform "ajouter" on Facebook, you add them as a friend. btw, I'm not a native english speaker, and I have the feeling that learning on Duolingo will have a negative impact on my english.


"Friend" is international, in the context of Facebook. We use it in Britain too.


I'm British and I've never heard anyone use it. It's always "add" - which is the correct translation of the French anyway.


I use "add" more myself, but i've heard "friend" plenty of times.

In any case, even if it was an American English term, Duolingo should accept it, since it's supposed to always accept American English.


One doesn't have to use "friend him". "Add him on Facebook" is accepted.


Can anyone explain what would be the difference in the FRENCH in these two English sentences:

  1. Friend him on Facebook. (French, ajoute-le)
  2. Add him to your contacts list.
    I assume it would also be 'ajoute-le' for 'add him,' but how would you know when to translate it as 'add him' and when to translate it as 'friend him' if we're given French sentences that literally say, 'add him as a contact'?


Only in French Facebook jargon, "ajouter" takes the meaning of "Friending." (Not even in other "high tech" or "virtual' parlance). That's what is Duo probably trying to teach us. So, one can safely translate ajouter par add in all other cases until the day another social medium decides to have a "Friend"option ! (I am speculating on the last point of course! ) :=)


Even more accurately, you can always translate ajoute-le as "add him" and never as "Friend him", even on Facebook.


Agreed, but without any context "le" could also refer to posting something on FB, eg a photo. :-D


The verb for posting something would be afficher, not ajouter.


perhaps we could learn some interesting new vocabulary instead of the rather obvious jargon of one of the world's richest countries ?


Add him on Facebook; that will please him.


As a native English speaker I've never heard of the verb "to friend". Surely "add" is the more accurate translate here?


This is wrong. No question at all. Ajouter is add in French AND English. It does not translate to 'Friend'. Just like in English it is implying the expression "add as a friend" by using only the word 'add'. This translation is wrong!


I don't use social media so I have no idea what friending someone is. But given add is one of the options, why is this not accepted?


You can friend people right here on Duolingo, although they're now going past that.


You can add someone as a friend right here on Duolingo.


i would say the correct translation is "add him as a friend on facebook"


The word "friend" is not present in the French, so just "Add him on Facebook" is the best translation.


"Add him to Facebook, that will please him." not accepted. I have never been on Facebook, but I understand that "friend" means to add someone. Why is this wrong? I had it wrong before, but then I understood "le" as "it", not as "him".


"sur" = "on", so it is "Add him on Facebook".


"Add it to Facebook, that will please him." was not accepted. I think that is a literal translation. What have I done wrong? Perhaps I don't understand Facebook, never having had anything to do with it.


I avoid social media (apart from on Duolingo) and therefore find some of the questions incomprehensible. I had similar trouble with the questions involving Spiderman and Batman as I know nothing about them.


Should one continue if this argot is the set standard?


that will please him; he will like that that will please him, and he will like that both have been accepted by DUO previously; also, I agree that add him is acceptable, although I have often heard "friend him" used by many Facebook users


Is "... ça lui plaira" mean the same as "...ça lui fera plaisir"?


This exercise sucks. I've been counted wrong for so many technicalities. "that will make him pleased" should be accepted.


It does not say that.


Why can't I say Add it on Facebook, it will make him happy.?

Friend him makes no sense to me, what does that mean?


I don't have Facebook, so I am not even sure what that is supposed to mean.


"that'll" is rejected as a contraction for "that will". GTFO DL. Quit your scumbag marking.


Friend him , don't friend him, can you make up your mind.


Why is "he will like that" wrong? Has tge person writing these translations spoken English on the last century?


Wrong what sentence is friend him on Facebook. Rubbish


Bad english again!


He will be pleased is much betyer english. Plesae do not expect word for word transition without regard for meaning at thus level !!!!


Reverso came back with: Add it on Facebook, it will make him happy. That seems fine too. There is no context for knowing what "le" stands for.


I never say 'to friend somebody' ajoute means add and when talking of friends I always use the word add.


Why is this le for him and not lui?


It would be considered the accusative, rather than dative, case. Think of it as "you add him", with the you being understood.


It might also be easier to think of this being about adding a post or a photo - then the pronoun "le" seems to be more natural anyway. Then substitute a person for the thing and the pronoun is the same.


How does one say "Add him to facebook; it will make him happy." ???


'that'll' is the same as 'that will'. Okay?

Learn French in just 5 minutes a day. For free.