"Il se promène en sous-vêtement, c'est gênant pour nous."

Translation: He takes walks in underwear; it's embarrassing for us.

[Black_Cherries]

It would be better English to say: "He takes walks in his underwear..."

[KvitfjellMann]

.. agreed. at the moment we don't know whose underwear he takes walks in.

[Vic3141]

I cannot think of a suitable response. Thankyou for the laugh.

[tachyonashley123]

"He takes walks in his underwear; it's embarrassing for us." accepted for me 11 March 2021.

[TheMonti42]

How about "he walks around in his underwear...." ?

[bigbucs]

English... He walks in HIS underwear.

[Guy248160]

"He takes walks" is the same in english as "he goes walking" which should be allowed but is not
It also sounds odd not to include the "his" - unless of course he is walking in someone else's underwear

[SeanFogart4]

I selected the word "embarrassing" and got:

"You have a typo.

He walks in his underwear; it's embarassing for us."

[SwervinMervin98]

Same here. I actually had to look it up, and it turns out, "embarrass" actually has two r's. As I'm writing out this comment, I'm actually using the speech-to-text microphone on my phone, and when I say the word "embarrass", it puts two r's on it.

[Vic3141]

S'il se promenait dans un masque, personne ne serait gêné.

[brevskrivning]

Il porte quelque chose au moins!

[Philip800560]

GOES WALKING FFS !!!!!!

[4MaryAnn7]

'He goes walking in underwear; it's awkward for us'. Not accepted as a translation.

[JonathanSk689393]

in the exercise one suggested translation is "He takes walks in underwear; it has embarrassing for us." This needs to be corrected

[chris615851]

He walks around in underclothes???

[Rich889905]

My version of this question was Type What You Hear. So, I typed:

ils se promenent en sous-vetements c'est genant pour nous

which, I'm pretty sure would sound exactly the same. Is that right??

[SueF77899]

we say 'underclothes' sometimes in England!