"Le visage de cet acteur n'est pas bien éclairé."

Translation: This actor's face isn't well lit.

[mistermoo]

The face of this actor is not well lit NOT ACCEPTED!!!!

[EW5PJ1A3]

Sometimes Duo likes more literal translations, sometimes it doesn't. Sigh. Reported.

[revles]

Accepted for me 10 Feb 2021

[Will256574]

The words well lit/lit well are transposible.

[DaveGarrar]

This is the same as: The face of this actor is not well lighted

[jrmama42]

"The face of this actor isn't well lighted" was not accepted. Reporting it.

[Don550357]

In one of the listening questions, in the slow version the sound of the 'cet' was wrong. Unfortunately I didn't report it. The word sounded like 'ces' not 'ce' or 'cet'. I ended up putting in 'ce' just on spec and it was ruled as correct even though cet was the right answer.

[V3WW9ody]

"This actor's face is not lighted well." is not accepted.

[rgrindle1]

And SHOULD be! "Lit" in idiomatic American English has an entirely different meaning than what I think Duo intended; it means one has had too much to drink!

[Bill237999]

This is ungrammatical English.

[Dave445544]

"Illuminated" instead of "lit" should be accepted. Reported 10 July 2021

[Sobhana8]

Some thingy wrong again

[Bill237999]

Not sure why "The face of this actor is not well lit up" was not allowed. In English we can say both "lit" and "lit up". Reported.

[Mootschi]

ahhh i got done in by my own accent; duo gave me "that" to use in the word bank, so i wrote "this actor's face is not that well lit", god it does sound like something a merseysider would say tbh, but it was marked wrong....i suppose there was nothing in the french to show a word like "that", "so", "quite"...ok...