"Enlève cette échelle, il va y avoir un accident."

Translation: Remove this ladder; there is going to be an accident.

[AndyKVA-USA]

in English we would more likely say "remove this ladder, OR there is going to be an accident."

[DX276ZKN]

"Take away this ladder, there's going to be an accident" - rejected - but "take away" surely as good as "remove"? Reported.

[Crassus123]

I had "Put this ladder away, there is going to be an accident" and got marked down.

[JuneDowns]

I agree.

[Ken67255]

'Take away' and 'remove' have exactly the same meaning.

[GraemeSarg]

I've not encountered "il y a" in the futur proche before, it caught me by surprise!

[Jennie269348]

Both sentences so far could easily be translated as:
1. He's going to have seventy guests at his party.
2. He's going to have an accident.

[CSA_GW]

I also keep thinking about how to differ "he is going to have..." and "there is going to be...".

The "y" seems being the key word to differ.

[karincanada]

Why is there no "de" after "avoir"?

[Jojo553168]

Avoir does not need the preposition de before its object.
You use sometimes de as a partitive article (J'ai de l'eau, j'ai du pain) but you can't have de l'accident (some accident).

[donneybrook]

In the UK we have the ladders as well as the ladder.