"Animals are not humans."
Translation:Gli animali non sono uomini.
Don't be so literal. In english we also use "man/men" as synonyms of "human/humans" in several occasions. I assume in italian it is just more common.
So there is not a separate word for humans? How would you differentiate between humans and men then?
You can also say umano or essere umano. Generally uomo is for man, but you can pick up the difference the same way you can in English.
I suppose it is possible to debate the philosophical teachings that being with "Man is... (a political animal/the measure of all things...)" but the point is that these days that doesn't refer to the gender ;)
hi there, could the answer be "animali non son uomini" since the english sentence doesn't have "the" thx.
so, when there's no "the", we're not supposed to write articles in italian? i wrote l'uomini and it wasn't correct
Well, it would be "gli uomini," not "l'uomini" - maybe that was the problem.
I tried that (gli uomini) and it was also incorrect. I'm confused about when the definite article is included.
"Gli" is used before masculine plural words beginning with a vowel or with z or s + consonant, "i" is used before every other masculine plural word. http://www.bbc.co.uk/languages/italian/language_notes/il.html
I put "gli" before animali and before uomini too, and the programm told me I was wrong... Don't understand. .
The correct is "Gli animali non sono uomini". There's no article before uomoni nor humans.
Why can this sentence contain either "gli" or no "gli". What is the distinction?
I think I've learned this already but I forgot, why is no sono not correct?
Because in Italian "no" is used the same way as in English: to answer questions, to decline offers. The translation of "not" is "non", that's the one used in negative sentences.
quoted from negyvenketto above: Because in Italian "no" is used the same way as in English: to answer questions, to decline offers. The translation of "not" is "non", that's the one used in negative sentences.
Can it also be translated "Gli animali sono non uomini"? Or does 'non' have to proceed 'sono'?
But I thought sono meant are, so when we say animals are it should be animali sono, right?
Yes, it would be "animali sono", if it asked for "animals are", but this question asked "animals are not", so we have to negate it, thus we add "non". We invert the positive.
animali non sono
It will sink in after a while, the way the Italian language is structured (he attempts to convince himself!).
Damn annoying when you answer it in the positive, only to realise that you misread the question! Especially with no hearts left and you are on the last question!! lol... moments of insanity.... priceless ;)