Yes, you would usually just say "Jeg spiser risen", i.e., "I eat the rice". The sentence would mostly be understood as "I eat the rice grains".
I'm not sure you would usually just say that. I'm guessing if you mean the actual dish, then you'd say "risen", whereas when you mean the rice in the dish, you'd say "risene". I dislike talking about rice in general, that's part of the reason why it will not appear that much later in the course.
Yes, you're right about that on second thought. As part of a dish with more things you would say "risene". "Risen" would be for the (rarer) occasions where there is only rice and even then you could probably say "risene".
But when we first learnt 'the rice' it was 'risen'. Perhaps we should have learnt 'risene' to begin with?
Danish pronunciation sounds like somebody with a thick Glasgow accent speaking Norwegian. Just me?
I was comparing it to an american who has no prior knowledge of the norwegian language and who is asked to read a few norwegian sentences, lol.
I'm confused, in one context would this sentence plausibly and naturally be used. From an English-speaker's background, rice is a collective noun, but may be pluralized in reference to different kinds of rice. Is this the same situation? The question is quite pertinent as collective nouns are a (sometimes) difficult and interesting part of many if not all languages.
Ris is countable in Danish, so you'd say 'risene' here even to refer to one type of rice.
It seems the pronunciation of risene from the audio clip sounds like ri-isene, where the "i" sounds cut into 2 parts, is there a reason for this or just how Danish is spoken?
It doesn't sound like cut in two parts for me. It's just a long 'i'. Danish has a pretty complex pronounciation, and the TTS doesn't always reflect that too well. If you're unsure about the pronounciation of some word, you can always check Forvo to see how it's pronounced by natives.
Risen and risene sound very different. Risen has the -en sound right after "ris", whereas risene has a 'e' sound between "ris" and "-ne" sounds. Try it!
Am i the only one confused about the verbs? This phrase for instance, why it's "i eat the rice" meaning i have a it as a sort of habit, like: i see the rice then i will eat the rice, because that's what i do. Instead of "i am eating the rice" meaning i I'm currently doing that, but may be the first and the last time i do such thing, it's just an action that started in the near past and kept going till the present. I don't know if i expressed my self well, but i guess that's about it... and it really bugs me that I've seen the meanings be applied to the same spiser, different sentences, but the verb was still the same
Danish simply doesn't have a progressive tense, so anything that happens in the now is expressed with the simple present, recurring or not.
idk why but i thought of filthy frank and just of him saying welcome to the ricefields ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
So risen is 'the rice' and risene is 'different kinds of rice'. That's the only thing that makes since here, and if you try to gainsay me, I will act like a French waiter towards an American tourist and dismiss every further utterance that comes out of your mouth.
You usually use the plural ris/risene when talking about rice as food. The logic here is that it's multiple grains of rice. It works like "peas" in English.
Both as a speaker of German and English using the plural of rice sounds very counter-intuitive to me... Would native speakers really say something like this?
It sounds like the voice is putting an extra vowel in "risene" by saying "ree-ee-seh-neigh". Is this correct?
The 'i' is a bit stretched in the voicing, but it shouldn't sound like multiple vowels. Risene should sound approximately like "REES-nuh"
In the previous sentence He eats the pasta is not accepted, He is eating is required. For consistency, here only "I am eating the rice" should be accepted, not "I eat the rice". The rule can't change randomly from one sentence to the next