"Jeg har ikke sko på."

Translation: I am not wearing shoes.

[Ozymandias0]

Dat barefoot revolution tho

[Euro_Neal]

kk,
guttural r,
soft d's,
are screwing me up over here

[rachelvantonder]

"kk" sounds like english "g" to me

[hxuanmin]

So, in Danish. We use "sko" in singular form for "shoes"?

[Xneb]

"Sko" is also the plural form (en sko (one shoe), skoen (the shoe), flere sko (several shoes), alle skoene (all the shoes))

[hxuanmin]

Thanks! :)

[Kitsune_Cavalry]

Way to be a rebelllllll~

[sincrociclotrone]

"I'm wearing no shoes" is not accepted

[bossman]

Because it's weird English

[marvincorea]

barefoot! love it!

[kiddo-depido]

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/feb/14/i-dont-wear-shoes-experience

[Dark_Devin]

I feel like if you're going to use this type of sentence structure it would make more sense to say the person has the article of clothing on, not that the person is wearing the article of clothing. I understand that Duolingo recognizes har X på as wearing X but it really should be has X on.

[lucaturilli]

what is the singular form of shoe then

[rachelvantonder]

"Sko" is for both singular and plural forms I believe.

[lucaturilli]

THANK YOU

[Xneb]

See my above comment in reply to pat5120

[lucaturilli]

thank you

[epingchris]

so, different from Swedish which uses a reflexive pronoun after "på" , in Danish it is correct to leave "på" dangling, is that correct?

[Magical_Michael]

In all honesty I might actually use this. I hate shoes.

[mitni]

They must be crazy

[Andreea99ec]

Why did we use 'har' in this sentence? Wasn't correct to say: Jeg pår ikke sko?

[Linneageugjes]

"Pår" is not a word in Danish :)

[not_justucetys]

Just got feet, don't got shoes!

[AlexWong2610]

Should "I do not have socks on" be accepted?

[AlexWong2610]

Oops sorry, I meant shoes*