"No, you do not go."

Translation: No, voi non andate.

[CiaoSharon]

This could be a command,...(tu) Non andare!

[math_hild]

how can we know if "you" refers to more than one person? we have to peek, right?

[dnovinc]

You don't have to, since there is no context you can translate this as "No, tu non vai" or "No, voi non andate". Even "No, Lei non va" (Lei = formal you ) should be correct.

[Shelly718]

correct. I answered: no, non vai and was graded as correct.

[TJTitmus]

me too

[DavidRussnak]

I would disagree. It absolutely matters if you're talking a specific person, or to a group. What DL accepts is irrelevant in regards to the question.

[IceCreamStar]

Sure, if you have context. Without context any of those options could be correct, so any should be accepted.

[Naseem200170]

Where is there a good list of irregular verbs on Duolingo?

[mowog]

No, non vai even worked

[CountSmash]

Not for me. Weird.

[lancEszterlanc]

What is the difference between "andate" and "vedete"?

[Naseem200170]

'Andate' is the plural you from of andare - to go

io vado, tu vai, Lui (lei, Lei) va, noi andiamo, voi andate, loro vanno

'Vedete' is the plural you form of verdure - to see

io vedo, tu vedi, lui (lei, Lei) vede, noi vediamo, voi vedete, loro vedono.

[SallyDeBain]

I got this after translating andiamo.

[Von351215]

Surely it should accept 'non va' for formal you

[JohnCaton2]

I thought it should be no non si va